1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

zuiko 50-200mm or m.zuiko 75-300mm for E-PM1

Discussion in 'Olympus Cameras' started by steve123, Dec 1, 2012.

  1. steve123

    steve123 Mu-43 Rookie

    Dec 1, 2012
    Hello all. I'm an auto-settings, takes a picture of anything, kind of guy looking to supplement my E-PM1 w/ go-to m.zuiko 14-150mm lens with a little extra reach and "clarity".

    I'm leaning towards the m.zuiko 75-300mm but a few of the longer range pics with the 14-150mm have left me wishing I had "better glass" - the zuiko 50-200 non-SWD. I can live with the bulk and mft focusing issues of the zuiko. So for between say 150-200mm would the 50-200mm really out do the 75-300 optics wise on the E-PM1?
  2. BarefootPilgrim

    BarefootPilgrim Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    Dec 23, 2009
    Westchester, IL
    Welcome to the forum, Steve!

    I have the non-SWD version of the 50-200, but in spite of the beautiful renderings it produces, find that I cannot use it much on my m-4/3 bodies. I think you'll be happier with the MZD 75-300, or if you're on a budget, the ZD 70-300. :eek: 

    The 50-200 autofocus is very poor on all the m-4/3 bodies I've tried, including the OM-D, EPL-2 and Panasonic G2. It's great on my E-5, E-620 and E-420, but just doesn't perform well with the contrast detect AF system of m-4/3 bodies.

    It's not that it's slow (which it is) but more that it hunts forever and often won't lock focus where I want it to. :frown:

    If you're willing to use it as a manual-focus lens, you'll grab some nice photos with it. But since you confess to being an "auto-everything" kinda guy, I doubt you'd be happy with any lens that's not designed for the m-4/3 contrast-detect AF system. The 75-300 is (since it's an m-4/3 native lens) and so is the ZD 70-300 for 4/3. And the ZD 70-300 is a very nice lens... one of the true gems of the 4/3 "standard grade" collection.
  3. steve123

    steve123 Mu-43 Rookie

    Dec 1, 2012
    Thanks Bob. I've tried the manual focus on my kit lenses, and you're right, I don't think I'd like that too much. And I'm guessing manual focusing on a PEN body would be even more tricky than w/a fuller bodycamera. I'll look at the ZD 70-300mm.
  4. kenez

    kenez Mu-43 Regular

    Apr 18, 2012
    I would echo what Bob said. I have the 50-200mm SWD lens and it is the poorest to lock focus of all my 4/3 lenses. I have tried both Pen series cameras and the OM-D E-M5.

    I am sure you are aware that the m4/3 75-300mm is a fairly "slow" lens, aperture-wise so it probably won't perform well in dim light.

    If you want a really inexpensive, but nice, zoom lens you could try to pick up a lightly used 4/3 40-150mm F3.5-4.5. This lens was discontinued and replaced by a slower aperture lens. You can find them for under $100. You would also need a 4/3 to m 4/3 adapter and 2X teleconverter to get it to 300mm so your all-in cost would probably be in the $500 range. However, you would then be set to experiment with other 4/3 lenses. As Bob said though, maybe the 75-300 4/3 lens would make the most sense as you wouldn't need a teleconverter. If you are interested, Here is a link to a nice review of the 40-150mm.

    Robin Wong: Shooting Animals with Olympus 40-150mm F3.5-4.5
  5. uci2ci

    uci2ci Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 22, 2012
    Los Angeles, CA
    Any reason why you are not considering the panasonic 100-300mm?. Its $200-300 cheaper and 1/2 stop faster than the olympus equivalent and just as sharp. Take a look at the birds thread in the Nature forum and the sample images thread for some examples
  6. steve123

    steve123 Mu-43 Rookie

    Dec 1, 2012
    kenez, thanks for the spelling out that option.

    Sam T, I hadn't considered the Pan 100-300mm because in my cursory, haphazard research, it wasn't standing out as a great lens optics wise and lagged behind the ZD70-300mm and MZD75-300mm - that is I thought I could reach out w/ the ZD & MZDs *&* have some super clear shots. I'lldefinitely look again at the panny, especially at that price. Thanks.
  7. hkpzee

    hkpzee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Sep 5, 2011
    Hong Kong
    I have a 50-200 SWD and I agree with others that it is SLOOOOW in AF when paired with an M4/3 camera. It hunts a lot, and often times misses focus entirely, so you are really better off using manual focus on this lens. Besides, do you know that the non-SWD version weighs over 1kg? The heavy weight makes it difficult to manual focus without a monopod or tripod support, especially when paired with a diminutive body like the E-PM1. I ended up getting the Panasonic 100-300 because of the attractive pricing, as well as the 1/2 stop faster aperture than the M. Zuiko 75-300.

    Let's see if this thread helps convince you:
  8. steve123

    steve123 Mu-43 Rookie

    Dec 1, 2012

    OCULUS Mu-43 Regular

    Dec 8, 2012
    Albany, NY
    Ray Hull
    DITTO; just sold mine in favor of the M75-300 and am loving it. Now having same debate over 4:3 7-14mm on the OM-D, much less the P-3. Both these monsters were wonderful workhorses on E-1 and E-3, but just aren't that convenient and are seemingly taxing the IS with these full 4:3s aboard the micro bodies.
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

  10. mark ulano

    mark ulano New to Mu-43

    Oct 30, 2012
    Los Angeles CA
    Mark Ulano
    Does anyone know why B and H has the M. Zuiko 75-300mm listed as a discontinued product? Is this a mistake?
  11. ghetto

    ghetto Mu-43 Regular

    I have the 70-300 4/3 lens plus adapter, I can say it's the best lens purchase I made. It can be found for about $150-160 on ebay and the vitrox adapter can be had for about $55 more, so just barely over $200 will get you an auto-focusing 300mm lens.

    There's a thread dedicated to that lens on here some where and my gallery has some photos taken with that lense if you want to see samples. I have an e-p1 so even older than your camera.
  12. steve123

    steve123 Mu-43 Rookie

    Dec 1, 2012
    I've got a pany 100-300mm on the way - flip of a coin over the 70-300mm :) 

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.