Showcase Zeiss Jena 135mm f3.5 MC

[akulya]

Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135/3,5 MC for M42

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

(E-P1, iso200, 1/60s, f3,5 @ min focus distance ~3')

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

(E-P1, iso200, 1/125s, f3,5 @ 20')

 

[akulya]

A few from the Cotswold Wildlife Park

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

No PP. All these were taken on apeture priority, ƒ3.5, Auto ISO (200-640), using an E-P1 and manual focus on the LCD.

While this did result in a few misses, it was not an impossible situation. Had the subjects been moving rapidly it would have been impractical, but as it was, it was a relaxed photographic expereince, with time to frame, and focus.

Telephoto is not my usual "thing", so this lens rarely gets used, and had almost been earmarked for sale - I now doubt that I will part with it; any softness is my fault, this lens really bites.

Colour reproduction is excellent, fur and plumage look full and natural. Perhaps due to the relatively simple sonnar formula.

A great lens.

 

[PMCC]

The IQ of this lens is addictive.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[PMCC]

Great for landscapes, too. Extremely sharp from F4, lots of resolution.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[ManofKent]

I picked up one of these recently for very little, and I think there are few lenses that offer better value:

All hand-held on a GM1:

Minor processing on these two:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Just a resize - unsharpened and handheld

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

And just for a bit of fun - 100% crop from the RAW file - unsharpened handheld shot - not bad detail for a lens that's around 30 years old and based on a pre WWII design... I suspect used on a tripod with more care to focusing it would be better still:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[T N Args]

Show me the lens!

 

[Speedliner]

Brilliant pictures. Nice lens, nice work everyone

 

[ManofKent]

Show me the lens!

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Excuse the dust - the foam seems to be degrading in the pouch it came in...

 

[T N Args]

That's a nice looking thing, although the adapter's pretty long?

 

[ManofKent]

That's a nice looking thing, although the adapter's pretty long?

I assume M42 adapters are all the same length to ensure focus at infinity - it's roughly 1" deep - don't forget the GM1 is a very small camera.

The lens itself is quite compact for a 135, but quite weighty 15oz ish. The lens was produced for decades so there are plenty of versions floating around. The later MC denoted ons have the best micro-contrast, but the older ones are still good performers.

 

[T N Args]

Yeah my FD 135/2.8 is about 14oz.