X100 vs X-system cameras

Steven

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,598
Location
USA
I've had Fuji X100 for a while now . I am very impressed with image quality vs. my Panasonic m43 set up. Everything is clear smooth sharp and noise free even at 100%. Sometimes I am tempted to try out one of the interchangeable lens Fuji X models to get that same quality in different focal lengths. However, I have this suspicion that at least some of the X100 clarity is due to that quiet shutter. I have photos take at as slow as 1/4 sec that are pretty decent. Would the clack of the XT1 or XE1 shutter result in less sharp photos than comparable photos from X100? If anyone has experience with both X100 and other X cameras could comment on this, I would appreciate it.
 

gryphon1911

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,742
Location
Central Ohio, USA
Real Name
Andrew
If you mean shutter shock, then yes, it is a possibility, however not very likely. You do gain the ability of using OIS in some of the ILC cameras, that is not built into the X100 series.

I found the shutters on the Fuji don't really have that big of an issue - they seem sufficiently dampened. The bigger difference is the fact that the Fuji X100/100s has a leaf shutter in the lens, whereas the changeable lens X cameras have regular curtain shutters.
 

Hyubie

Unique like everyone else
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
1,393
Location
Massachusetts
Real Name
Herbert
It is a natural progression for some Fuji X users, started with X100/s then added the X system.
I may be unnatural then. I went from X system to X100s. LOL

I find the X100s + m43 system to be very complementary with each other. I am very happy with both systems, and I get the best of both worlds (or very close to it). IMO adding a second system very quickly muddles everything.

(Sorry if it veered a bit off topic.)
 

battleaxe

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
773
Location
Somewhere in California
I may be unnatural then. I went from X system to X100s. LOL

I find the X100s + m43 system to be very complementary with each other. I am very happy with both systems, and I get the best of both worlds (or very close to it). IMO adding a second system very quickly muddles everything.

(Sorry if it veered a bit off topic.)
I think that depends on the size/features of the camera. Like a GFx or E-PMx camera and a Fuji model with an EVF could work together, each serving a different purpose.

On topic, I had been researching Fuji X cameras I am looking(well I just did) get into the system; from all the images & reviews I have seen & read I've yet to see any one mention a shutter shock issue with the X system cameras.
 

fransglans

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
1,212
Location
Sweden
Real Name
gus
you can always add the wide and tele adapters to your x100. gives u 28mm and 50mm equivalent.
 

chipbutty

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2012
Messages
608
Location
Sheffield, Yorkshire, England.
Real Name
Rob
You're not on your own. I have a m43 system and an X100. I usually take both the X100 and EM5 out with me. I only have 50mm and 90mm equivalent lenses for the EM5 so the X100 does really nicely for anything wider.

The X100 is such a wonderful camera. I could happily just use that camera and no other. Add the TCL-X100 and/or WCL-X100 and you could have a great little system.

I haven't answered your question :)
 

yakky

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jul 1, 2013
Messages
661
I had an X100 and still have an XE1. I loved the leaf shutter and fast sync speeds but to me the lens just wasn't anywhere as sharp as the 35 1.4 and I like that FOV better.
 

mnhoj

There and back again and again
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
1,585
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
John M
I've been shooting an X-E1 for almost a year.
No 1/4 second shots here but also haven't noticed any sshock issues as long as I stay at approx. the 1.5X focal length/shutter speed rule.
Without having shot with an X100, I would have to guess that you would lose that advantage.
 

chipbutty

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2012
Messages
608
Location
Sheffield, Yorkshire, England.
Real Name
Rob
That surprises me as I find that lens to be exceptionally sharp. It's not exceptionally sharp at f2 but by f4 it's just superb.

I had an X100 and still have an XE1. I loved the leaf shutter and fast sync speeds but to me the lens just wasn't anywhere as sharp as the 35 1.4 and I like that FOV better.
 

Matero

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
528
Location
Finland
This forum is far more active than Fuji sister site. Maybe that's the reason :)
 

rbelyell

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
367
Location
Mountains of NY
i was in exactly your situation, loved the x100, loved the IQ, quiet shutter and user experience. tried the xp1 and didnt like it at all. the louder shutter was certainly a negative, but what was dispositive for me is that all the other X ILCs have a different sensor--called xtrans--from the x100. this leads to a very different look from the unique x100 sensor that i absolutely, and subjectively, did not care for. i found a distinct lack of crispness in the xtrans files, and the color was different too.

point being the x100--even vs the 100S--is a unique animal in the fuji zoo. loving its output has no carryover to the other xtrans sensored models. that means just as i personally liked xtrans less, you personally might like it more, but it will not be the same.
 

Jonathan F/2

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
5,003
Location
Los Angeles, USA
I've had Fuji X100 for a while now . I am very impressed with image quality vs. my Panasonic m43 set up. Everything is clear smooth sharp and noise free even at 100%. Sometimes I am tempted to try out one of the interchangeable lens Fuji X models to get that same quality in different focal lengths. However, I have this suspicion that at least some of the X100 clarity is due to that quiet shutter. I have photos take at as slow as 1/4 sec that are pretty decent. Would the clack of the XT1 or XE1 shutter result in less sharp photos than comparable photos from X100? If anyone has experience with both X100 and other X cameras could comment on this, I would appreciate it.
Why not get a GX7 with a real silent electronic shutter, improved sensor performance and 2 axis IBIS? For sure you can shoot at low shutter speeds using that setup and still use all your current glass?
 

Pili

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
224
Location
Boulder, CO
Real Name
Alex
I have an x100 and µ43 setup also. They work well together and would only ditch my EM-5 for something like an A7/future camera if the systems really mature in the next few years. If I weren't already invested in µ43, I might give Fuji X a try, but I think the next major sensor upgrade should take care of most of my qualms with the current image quality.
 

ean10775

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
1,203
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Real Name
Eric
I use an X100S as my primary camera after selling off my full frame Canon gear. I also have a G5 and an E-PL1. I previously owned an X-E1 with the 35mm lens and while it was certainly sharp, I didn't like it as a primary camera as it simply wasn't as responsive a camera as either the Canon or the then current m43 options. Also, the lenses are noticeably larger than their m43 counterparts (at least to me). One thing to also keep in mind is that the Fuji X-mount cameras use a completely different sensor than the X100 and love it or hate it, the files from the X-Trans cameras have a different look to them than the X100 and require a different type of processing which can sometimes be a bit of a challenge (again at least for me).
 

gryphon1911

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,742
Location
Central Ohio, USA
Real Name
Andrew
I started my mirrorless life using the Fuji X10, then going to the X-E1 and various lenses(see signature). Used them for well over a year and while i did enjoy using them from time to time and they do produce very nice JPG, I was missing a lot of street shots because the camera was not as responsive as I needed it to be for the way I shoot. I even contemplated upgrading to the Fuji X-T1, but when I tested it against the Olympus OMD series cameras and even an X100s....the Olympus was the one that was most DSLR-like in its responsiveness.

I know a lot of people that absolutely love the Fuji X system and they are great, just not for everyone....same as the m43 systems are not for everyone either.
 

Steven

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,598
Location
USA
Why not get a GX7 with a real silent electronic shutter, improved sensor performance and 2 axis IBIS? For sure you can shoot at low shutter speeds using that setup and still use all your current glass?
Do you find Gx7 files look better straight out of camera than Gx1? X100 really spoils me with its perfect Jpegs that require almost no post work.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom