With 12-40 in hand 14-150 seems like an overlap...

Discussion in 'This or That? (MFT only)' started by mesmerized, Aug 5, 2016.

  1. mesmerized

    mesmerized Mu-43 Veteran

    432
    Jun 18, 2012
    Hello everyone!

    Since I got a 12-40 PRO I haven't used my 14-150mk2 at all, so I'm wondering if there's a better lens that would complement, rather than overlap, the focal length that my 12-40 delivers. Naturally, once could claim that I get this extra length (41 and above) in a compact body, but to be honest... I'm pretty sure there must be a better image quality solution out there... The 40-150PRO sounds like a natural way to go, but it'd expensive ;)

    Any thoughts?

    Cheers
     
  2. Carbonman

    Carbonman Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jul 10, 2014
    Vancouver BC
    Graham
    I use the daylights out of my 12-40; it's very sharp and the close focus is really useful. What dragged me away from using it 90% of the time was when I 'upgraded' from the 40-150 'R' (no slouch, especially for the $$) to the 40-150 Pro. It's on my camera at least half the time now. A constant f2.8 maximum aperture, high contrast, almost nonexistent flare, very high sharpness and quasi-macro close focus capability make it the perfect next step in building your system. The 2 drawbacks are bulk/weight and price. I can't seem to stop hauling it around despite the weight - it's that useful. Add the 1.4 TC and you have almost 9x magnification over 'normal'.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  3. lchien

    lchien Mu-43 Veteran

    235
    Aug 7, 2014
    Texas
    I have had the O 14-150 (Mk I) for 2 years now, its been the lens that's been most on the camera.
    I just got the 12-40 f2.8 PRO and used it recently at a music party with good luck, the extra speed was nice.

    I still like the overall reach or zoom range of the 14-150 mm, the smaller aperture is one of the prices paid, but I'm not willing to give it up.
    The 40-150 mm f4 versions are virtually the same size as the 14-150 so there's no gain to be had by getting that as a replacement; New they would be $300 vs 100-120 but if you already have the 14-150 then you get the advantage of not having to swap lenses if you need (time or bad weather). And the new 14-150 II is weather sealed, I believe.
    The 40-150 f2.8 PRO is nice but out of my budget now and also quite a bit heavier and larger.
    So I'm not sure there's a better solution.
     
  4. fredlong

    fredlong Just this guy...

    Apr 18, 2011
    Massachusetts USA
    Fred
    The Panasonic 35-100/2.8 would be a good, fast companion to the 12-40 if you don't need the extra length. It's smaller, lighter and cheaper.

    Fred
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  5. barry13

    barry13 Super Moderator; Photon Wrangler Subscribing Member

    Mar 7, 2014
    Southern California
    Barry
    Hi, the ZD 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 is good, and cheap (used) if you have an E-M1 (and an adapter).
     
  6. mattia

    mattia Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 3, 2012
    The Netherlands
    +1 on the 50-200 SWD, with the MMF3, EC-14 and an E-M1.

    The only thing I should warn you about is that this may lead you to rationalize getting the Oly 150/2.0 (and the EC-20 teleconverter) when one comes along at quite a bit less than the 40-150 PRO costs, and that said lens may not leave your camera for a while after that.
     
  7. PakkyT

    PakkyT Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 20, 2015
    New England
    I brought my ZD 50-200mm over from my 4/3rds days to my E-M1. Fantastic lens and as pointed out by @barry13@barry13 is very affordable (a down right bargain actually) second hand these days. If you have an E-M1 a strong option in my opinion.

    In the m43 world, I would be looking at the Olympus 40-150PRO or the Panny 35-100/2.8 (X Lens) as my two choices to be at least as good as the old 50-200mm and to match the performance of your 12-40 PRO. Personally I would give strong consideration to the Panny as it is a lot smaller. But if you don't mind the extra weight you do gain the 100-150mm range of the Oly.
     
  8. PacNWMike

    PacNWMike Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Dec 5, 2014
    Salish Sea
    Personally I would look for something wider.
     
  9. mesmerized

    mesmerized Mu-43 Veteran

    432
    Jun 18, 2012
    Thanks for the suggestions.
    I've got E-M5mk2 with a grip (the basic one)
    As a side note, I don't really like the plasticky feel of the 14-150mk2.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.