Will it make benefits by adding Olympus 45/1.8 to my lens kit?

wilco23

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
24
I already have 12-40/2.8, PL25/1.4, 35-100/2.8, 75/1.8, Olympus 60/2.8. In terms of usage, 60/2.8, 12-40/2.8 is the most and PL25/1.4 and Oly 75/1.8 is the least. After I look thorugh robinwong's blog I like his portrait shots with 45/1.8. Will it be benefit by adding 45/1.8 to my kit? Currently only Pana 35-100/2.8 cover for that focal length. Your comment is really appreciated.
 

SimonL

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
140
Location
NW England
Look back through your picture archives. If a lot of them are at the long end of the 12-40 then it's still only a 'maybe'. If not, don't bother, you've got good glass already.
 

carterru

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
68
Not at all. A very similar Bokeh and framing (moving in closer) can be achieved with the Pana 25mm.

Apart from background compression, but u can get that and better with your 35-100mm.
 

bacil

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
114
Location
Minnesota
I love that small cheap excellent beautiful rendering lens for portrait. Whether you need it, only you can tell.
 

usayit

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
2,964
Location
Some call it the arm pit of NYC.
Looks like you really like zooms... I would stick to that.

I'm kinda the opposite. I really like the O12, O25, and O45 combination which closely mimics what I use on other systems. I don't find FOV 25mm anywhere close to that of a FOV 45mm.
 

wilco23

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
24
Thanks for all your reply.
@usayit - I am a bit lazy to switch lens during casual shooting. When I bought EM-1 there was offer bundle with 12-40/2.8 and I went that route because it was cheaper than going with prime at that time. When I check all my photos, I used 24mm most and the rest are between 30 to 50mm (35mm equivalent) and 80mm is the third most photos I have taken.
 

oldracer

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,695
Location
USA
...Your comment is really appreciated.
I would say that unless you do a lot of low-light shooting, your lenses are already too duplicative. The 45mm, wide open, will blur the background more than the 35-100 but you can also do that in post for free. And 45mm is approximately 40mm, so you really have that focal length covered with two lenses, not just one.
 

usayit

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
2,964
Location
Some call it the arm pit of NYC.
@usayit - I am a bit lazy to switch lens during casual shooting.
Nothing wrong with that.... zooms are highly flexible in their use. It looks like you like that flexibility, so I would stick to that. Early in the 80s (or was it 70s) zooms were relatively new technology and the difference in quality was noticeable. We are lucky today that modern zooms are pretty good.... especially when we are talking about the higher end zooms including the 12-35mm f/2.8, 12-40mm f/2.8, and the 35-100mm f/2.8


Your photography (how you shoot too.) should drive your equipment purchases not the other way around. If it doesnt' fit you... it doesn't fit.... don't force it.
 

biza48

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
42
Location
Portugal
you can achieve a similar look to the 45 with your 75mm lens, you just need to move back a few paces. Actually, your 75 will be much better to achieve subject-background separation. Learn to use the lenses you already have.
 

lightmonkey

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
479
yes for a few reasons:
-its cheap
-much better working distances than the 75/1.8
-much faster af than 60/2.8
-stronger defocus than 25/1.8 and the 2.8 constant zoom

i have similar lens arsenal to your and i dont feel like the 45 is replaceable
 

zensu

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
1,287
Location
Alabama USA
Real Name
Bobby
you can achieve a similar look to the 45 with your 75mm lens, you just need to move back a few paces. Actually, your 75 will be much better to achieve subject-background separation. Learn to use the lenses you already have.
I agree about the 75mm, it's perfect for a really close/intimate portrait of the face or head but sometimes you can only back up so far. I think the 45mm will compliment the 75mm for portraits or subject isolation if you're shooting more than one person. It's like the 75mm portraits are great for facial or head shot where the 45 shines for head and shoulders or two person shots.
 

SpecFoto

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
786
Location
So Cal Desert
Real Name
Jim
After I look thorugh robinwong's blog I like his portrait shots with 45/1.8. Will it be benefit by adding 45/1.8 to my kit?
For me, portraits is what the 45mm f/1.8 is all about. Plus it is a stop and a (almost) half faster than the 12-40, which is a lot. The 12-40 zoom is very good, but it is not the same as a faster prime lens.

I shoot mostly portraits and Lightroom tells me in the last 22 months of the 12,500 +/- OMD portrait shots, about 6,600 (53%) are with the 45mm. The 75mm (25%) and 12-40 (22%) represent the remaining amount. Previous to and now along side of the OMD I use Nikon D700/800 and it is pretty much the same. The 85mm f/1.4 usage is 55%, the 135mm DC f/2 is 15% and 105mm DC f/2 and 24-70 f2.8 are the rest. While I have the Nikon 70-200mm VR lens, it was used for only 2% of my portrait shots (because I love the 105 and 135 f/2 DC lenses). The point is, if you shoot portraits a faster prime in the 85mm to 105mm (FF) is your workhorse lens in most cases.

The 45mm f/1.8, especially with the $300 US pricing out there right now, it is a no brainer if you shoot portraits. Mine is sliver but I am considering getting a black one as a backup.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom