I've only had a m43 camera for a couple of months, and basically it's my first camera since I was a child. I got a GF2 with the 14-42, as well as the 20mm. I've been taking pictures of whatever pleases me (hiking, cities, people, etc) and found that I basically only use the kit lens at either 14mm or 42mm. Especially on the wide end, there are often times I'd like to be able to get more into the photo - for landscapes I can make a panorama, but not so good if anything is moving! So, I've decided I want to get a wide angle lens. After looking about, I'm leaning to the 9-18mm because it's smaller and cheaper. But, I also see people who say that the extra 2mm in the Panasonic makes a big difference, or that the Panasonic's image quality is a lot better. So, my question is, as a novice (and I don't think I'm doing anything too extreme), am I likely to miss those things? Or will the Olympus lens be wide 'enough' and sharp 'enough' for me to take nice pictures? Of course, if I can save a little money it can be spent on something else down the track.