Wide angle recommendation for a GF1

megalaser

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
12
Hi, Could anyone recommend a really wide angle (and sharp from corner to corner) lens that will work with the GF1? I am looking for something wider than the 14-45mm but not fisheye shaped. Maybe there is a DSLR lens that might be physically larger than a micro four thirds lens but would be good quality and do the job with an adaptor? The Panasonic 7-14mm looks great but it's really expensive so I am hoping to find something like that in an adapted lens that's more affordable . . . . . any suggestions appreciated.
 

William

New to Mu-43
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
4
I'd save up for the 7-14. Not that big of a lens on the GF1. Excellent, sharp lens. Not sure you'll find an equivalent lens at all those focal lengths that will perform as well as the 7-14. Maybe the Nikkor AF 14/2.8, but a huge chunk of glass and heavy, and expensive. I don't know much about the other manufacturers but the prices will be high for those super wides.
 

PeterB666

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
780
Location
Tura Beach, Australia
Real Name
Peter
I am considering the Olympus 11-22mm and an adaptor over the 9-18mm as the larger aperture is useful for me as I do a lot of shooting in poor light or at night. While I stop down, the brighter image helps with focusing.
 

cosinaphile

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,123
Location
new york city
if 23mm equiv is wide enuf for you then may i suggest a 35 dollar solution that i feel works very well and is sharper to the corners than i would have imagined [14 x 0.8 = 11.5 x 2 = 23mm equiv??]

heres what i did, using the robustly built panny 14-45 i mounted the rather large heavy A-28 olympus WA adapter 0.8x [49mm thread] on to the 52mm threaded front of the kit zoom
with a step ring ,the weight is no problem and if used only at the 14mm end of the zoom range gives an image with no vignetting and even light and good sharpness to the corners , if zoomed to 45 image quality is very poor [ its a WA adapter after all]

the a 28 was intended to widen an older olympus bridge camera from 35 to 28 mm
its a large heavy optic that gathers light well

i was waiting for the olympus 9-18 m4\3 with great anticipation for many months but when i discovered it would be a flimsy collapsible zoom like the toy-like oly 14-42 kit zoom , i began to lose interest,
when i discovered it would cost significantly more than the nicely built 4\3 9-18mm
at 700 bucks, i was even more put off..... i decided to buy the older 4\3 version instead at some point in the future ,or perhaps the panny 7-14, hopefully used

the a-28 is a quality adapter , its available used on e bay [20 bucks ?]
i believe it was meant to sell for 100 - 150 dollars more than a decade ago
 

Maczero

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
141
Location
Fife
I'd be interested to know how this works out for you as I have a 11 - 22 as well. Do you think the FT 9 - 18 mm would work as well? I am off on hols on Tuesday and wondering if what the most credible WA option from my existing FT lenses with my GF1. A mu-FT option is not on the cards at the moment.

Andrew
 

grum

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
104
the a-28 is a quality adapter , its available used on e bay [20 bucks ?]
i believe it was meant to sell for 100 - 150 dollars more than a decade ago
Hi, do you have any example pics taken with this combo? Thanks.
 

mrbrown

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
10
I got a Voigtlander 12mm f5.6 for my GF1. It is a very good wideangle though it does not open wide enough in low light.
 

LisaO

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
798
Location
New York Metro Area
Real Name
Lisa
I've had the Voigtlander 12mm 5.6 for about 5 years but never used it much on my Leica but I find it quite useful on my m 4/3 cameras. It's so wide that everything seems in focus.
 

Roel

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
13
Location
Ontario, Canada
I bit the bullet and got the Panny 7-14mm f/4 ... and since I bought it, I have never regretted it. Yes it is expensive and it is worth every penny. It is so small and light and I use it all the time on my GF1 - it goes with me everywhere and I have gotten shots I would not have otherwise had.

At first, I thought about getting the new Oly 9-18mm when they announced it, but I did not want to wait that long as I was going on a couple trips and needed a UWA lens. I am sure the Oly will be a good lens, but the Panny is simply superb and available now.

Life is short. Buy the best you can afford.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom