1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Why don't other manufacturers provide first party native raw support

Discussion in 'Other Systems' started by tomO2013, Dec 5, 2014.

  1. tomO2013

    tomO2013 Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    Oct 28, 2013
    As it stands today, other than Olympus with their m43 lineup support (Olympus Viewer 3) and Nikon with their V series (Capture NX-D) no other mirror-less camera makers looks to be providing first party support for their cameras. This is a huge pity as there is often a large discrepancy in output quality between a what a camera can put out in JPEG and the initial starting point in most 3rd party RAW processors.

    For example the SOOC jpegs in a Fuji XT1/XE1 are beautiful. Lightroom has a tendancy to must colours and detail.
    LR, DXO , capture one do a lousy job of skin tones compared to the Olympus Viewer 3 output. Failing to actually reproduce the native Olympus skin tones and I've found tending towards either a default jandice look in LR or a magenta look in DXO. Process the same files through OV3 and you get much much nicer skin tones and beautiful colours (IMHO, but this is subjective anyway).

    My point is, I'd love to see Sony, Samsung, Fuji, Panasonic and the rest jump on-board and provide first party RAW support.

    Part of the reason that people still flock to Canon / Nikon is because of the first party support for their systems extends far beyond just the camera and lens to things like flash support, backup service, training programmes and software support (which appears to be such an obvious thing given that we are in a digital age!)
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.