I'm a fine one to talk I suppose as I have mine up for trade but not because I didn't like it but because I like/need an EVF and my G2s EVF is a lot better than the LVF1 (although the LVF1 isn't terrible). That said, the GF2 is a very capable camera that gets trashed by folks in favor of the GF1 and GF3. What gives? The GF1 has more buttons and the all important AEL/AFL button...is that it? Seriously? It's not like the GF2 doesn't have that ability its just not in a button. IQ wise its the same as the GF1 AND GF3. The GF2 also has 1080i video (which the GF1 does not) to boot and a hotshoe (which the GF3 does not.) Now granted it's not a proper upgrade to the GF1 but it was also a LOT less expensive at release as well. Steve Huff calls is a dog (or something equally denigrating) and even mentions he likes the IQ of the GF3 better while fawning over the GF1. I've had a number of m43 cameras and I have yet to see a significant difference between them IQ wise. They are different and I can understand having a preference but it does seem like the poor GF2 is getting kicked ot the curb for no good reason. I have half a mind to keep it just so whoever trades me for it doesn't turn it into scrap. Okay so it's not the GF1...sheesh that doesn't make it the worst camera since the Polaroid Swinger. I will say one of my all time favorite photos came off of my GF2 and my Panasonic 20.