Which would you choose - 14/20/45 or 14/45/100-300 or 14/20/100-300?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by Jonathan F/2, Sep 21, 2011.

  1. Jonathan F/2

    Jonathan F/2 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 10, 2011
    Los Angeles, USA
    I'm trying to decide which lens combination I should keep? If you had the choice between the 14/20/45, 14/20/100-300 or the 14/45/100-300, which would you prefer?

    (BTW - Referring to the Olympus 45 1.8)

    Thanks!
     
  2. Shield

    Shield Mu-43 Regular

    133
    Jul 11, 2011
    Worthington Ohio
    14/45/100-300 imo.

    Great street lens and close ups, great portrait and great zoom/telephoto.
     
  3. WT21

    WT21 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Feb 19, 2010
    Boston
    20/45/100-300, though that wasn't one of the choices given. If you can't do that one, then 14/45/100-300.

    Actually, my preferred would be 14/20/45/100-300, lol. The three prime are really cool, but if you need reach, then you need reach!
     
  4. stratokaster

    stratokaster Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jan 4, 2011
    Kyiv, Ukraine
    Pavel
    My choice would be 12/20/45, but I generally don't use telephotos.
     
  5. Linh

    Linh Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Apr 14, 2009
    Maryland, US
    of those, 14/45/100-300, mostly for the range. hard to really say w/o being you, heh. Do you do a lot of telephoto? I thought I would, but honestly, stick to 20 most of the time. Which is why i want that 35-100 to be good cause while I don't do it often, I'd like to have a good fast tele.
     
  6. PSH

    PSH Mu-43 Regular

    40
    Jul 6, 2011
    No doubt :thumbup:
     
  7. Promit

    Promit Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 6, 2011
    Baltimore, MD
    Promit Roy
    14/45/100-300.
     
  8. Tom Swaman

    Tom Swaman Mu-43 Veteran

    14/45/100-300 if this is your limit. If not, I would add the 14-140 depending upon what you are photographing. Yes, this gives you an overlap at both ends of the 14-140 range, but it also optimizes IQ.

    Good luck,
    Tom
     
  9. LovinTheEP2

    LovinTheEP2 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    619
    Feb 15, 2011
    Toronto
    From your list.. 14/45/100-300

    Me personally.. 20/45/100-300 but also maybe the 20/45/14-140 as I personally don't need the 150-300 reach.

    However, it seems you really want the 14 and willing to get a 20 as well in some of the setup:

    12, 20, 45, 100-300 would be a serious kit
     
  10. Canonista

    Canonista Mu-43 Top Veteran

    570
    Sep 3, 2011
    L.A.
    If I were buying right now, I'd go all prime. I'll get a tele zoom when someone releases a faster (f/2.8 or better) model.
     
  11. Jonathan F/2

    Jonathan F/2 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 10, 2011
    Los Angeles, USA
    The purist in me, thinks the 14/20/45 would be the best option. But part of me feels the 14/45/100-300 would give me the best option for travel. I'd go with the 12 on the wide end, but that would go over my budget! I'm trying to make a rule not to go over $500 on any m43 lens! I'm also considering the 7-14, 45 option as well!
     
  12. drizek

    drizek Mu-43 Veteran

    492
    Aug 5, 2011
    Probably 9-18, 45, 100-300 if I had to pick just 3

    but to those I would add the 20mm and the Panny X 175mm telephoto, if price was no object.
     
  13. elandel

    elandel Mu-43 All-Pro

    Apr 16, 2010
    Milan, Italy
    I also think the best for my choice would be: 20/45/100-300

    otherwise 14/45/100-300
     
  14. Luke

    Luke Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jul 30, 2010
    Milwaukee, WI
    Luke
    same here.....most of the time, the 20 is wide enough....and if when I need wider, I'll just stitch 2 shots. Or I'd add the 14-42....it's cheap enough on the used market and is no worse than than the 14mm prime.
     
  15. elandel

    elandel Mu-43 All-Pro

    Apr 16, 2010
    Milan, Italy
    Well this may make someone jump from their hair: but that is the reason I didn't buy the 14 when I wanted to; it's as good as the kit lens at 14 so it's only advantage is it's a pancake...which obiviously is a very good advantage.
    But I preferred the 20mm.
     
  16. WT21

    WT21 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Feb 19, 2010
    Boston
    Though two 20mm shots stitched is a very different aspect ratio. You'd need 4 stitched, and properly, to make up for the 14mm. Still, though, Pano has it's uses!
     
  17. Jonathan F/2

    Jonathan F/2 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 10, 2011
    Los Angeles, USA
    Basically this setup is going to be used 1st as my family photo kit, and 2nd as a travel setup. I also have a fully equipped Nikon kit, but that would require me having to bring both my Nikon gear and m43 kit for travel. On the Nikon side I also own a 70-200 & 300 f/4, so I'm thinking I might not need the 100-300 so much.

    This is how my lens usage will be: 14 for group shots, 20 for walk-around, 45 for portraits and small telephoto, 100-300 for daytime general shooting.
     
  18. elandel

    elandel Mu-43 All-Pro

    Apr 16, 2010
    Milan, Italy
    That would be ideal also for me but need just something to fill the 45-100 gap.
     
  19. pharaviel

    pharaviel Mu-43 Veteran

    313
    Jun 20, 2011
    Reggio Emilia, Italy
    Daniele Frizzi
    My setup il 20 + 45.200, and i will receive soon the 14 and buy the 45 when it arrives here... If i had to drop one... The 14. I don't use/like wides so much. My ideal lens is a prime something between 85 and 135.

    Sent from my iPhone using Mu-43 App
     
  20. drizek

    drizek Mu-43 Veteran

    492
    Aug 5, 2011
    Panasonic is coming out with a 35-100mm lens... at some point.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.