I took these two shots with different cameras while in PA Dutch country. Was wondering which you prefer and why. Would really like to hear the reasons why one might appeal over the other. If you don't like either, that's OK too, but just let me know why. Just for information: Not that I think these are great shots, but they were shot with very different cameras, and I got hung up on the qualities that each camera presented. I wanted to hear what other folks respond to -- color, sharpness, B&W, etc. But the composition did get in the way. The shot on the left was shot with an EP3 + 14-150, at 14mm f/4.0 and ISO1600. The shot on the right is scanned from Film - Canonet 40mm shot at 1.7 ISO 400, Fuji Reala (I think it was Reala). I like the colors and the feel of #2, but agree #1 was the more interesting shot. I was trying to get the bright yellow chair with the Canonet in #2. I think the colors worked, but not the composition. I've done some pp work on shot number one, and put them in post 12 here: https://www.mu-43.com/f56/shot-do-you-prefer-16867/index2.html#post155443 Thanks for the feedback!