Which faster 135-150mm?

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by apicius9, Feb 17, 2011.

  1. apicius9

    apicius9 Mu-43 Veteran Subscribing Member

    441
    Feb 1, 2010
    Philadelphia, PA
    Hi,

    I am in the process of streamlining my collection a bit - trying to get reasonable after my manic phase ;) I am well covered in most ranges, but I was wondering what you would recommend as a faster manual lens (let's say 2.0 - 2.8) in the 135-150mm range for my GH2. I have a few older lenses in that range (some 150mm c-mounts, an old 135 Hektor, old 135 Sonnar etc), but they are all 4.0 or slower and I plan on selling most of them to narrow it down to one decent lens in that range. I was looking at newer 135mm Sonnars or the Leica R 135mm Elmarit, but I am hoping there will be something a little cheaper out there? Reasonably sharp wide open and not too difficult with flares would be great.

    Thanks,

    Stefan
     
  2. shrimp123

    shrimp123 Mu-43 Regular

    35
    Oct 9, 2010
    i have used one of vivitar 135mm/f2.8 on 4/3. Decent and cheap.

    but once i switched to u4/3 i have it up for sale, since i "feel" it is too long on my epl1, as far as balance with adapter is concerned.

    i cant find a 135-200 that balances nice on my epl1 :(

    View attachment 3312

    S
     
  3. labcoatguy

    labcoatguy Mu-43 Regular

    130
    Jan 23, 2011
    Cambridge, MA, US
    There are Olympus OMs at 135, one at 2.8 and 3.5. I have a 3.5 coming in the mail and should be able to give an impression of it it this weekend.
     
  4. jimr.pdx

    jimr.pdx Mu-43 Veteran

    342
    Dec 5, 2010
    near Longview ~1hr from PDX
    Jim R
    I came to :43: from Pentax gear, so that's all I can suggest.

    I had a Rikenon XR 135/2.8, great images but quite heavy at 500g. I find that a 500-gram lens ± is too near my threshold, I tend to find excuses not to carry them - so I sold it. Sadly, that removes a bunch of fast telephoto lenses from my list. :frown: Pentax made several series of lenses including the Pentax-M (fully manual), -A (auto-aperture but still has aperture ring) and earlier lenses, including many with M42 threads. The M series is generally acclaimed as the most compact, which for :43: makes sense to me. The Pentax-M 135/3.5 may be a smidge slow for you but it's just my type at 270g; they also made a 150/3.5. For more speed there are -M 100mm and 120mm f/2.8s. I'd love to find the latter, 270g + built-in hood! Reviews of all these at pentaxforums site. Pentax-A 135mm is also f/2.8.

    p.s. money no object? how about the 135 f/1.8 Pentax-A*? at 865g it's clearly not for me :smile:
     
  5. thearne3

    thearne3 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    807
    Jan 28, 2010
    Redding, CT USA
    I just got the OM 135 f2.8 - a very compact lens, seems to be sharp wide open, as well. It's only 3 1/8" long, 12oz, and takes 55mm filter. Full data here:

    http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/olympusom1n2/shared/zuiko/htmls/135mm.htm

    I am trading up from a great lens - not quite as fast - the Hexanon 135 f3.2. Hexanon also makes an f2.5. Full data here (look under the AR section):

    www.buhla.de - Overview Konica SLR Hexanon and Hexar lenses

    Shameless plug: Hexanon f3.2 is for sale in Classifieds. :rolleyes:

    Note: anything faster than 2.5 is going to be expensive at 100mm+
     
  6. penfan2010

    penfan2010 Mu-43 All-Pro

    Nov 12, 2010
    NJ, USA
    Agree with Thearne3, the Oly OM 135mm F2.8 is a great lens. Used it for a long time on my OM-1, E-500 and E-P1, and it was nice to have a (almost) F2.8 lens with the last 2 cameras. Very sharp, nice color, easy to hand hold.
     
  7. iliakoltsov

    iliakoltsov Mu-43 Regular

    195
    Aug 7, 2010
    Paris
    Well a faster than 2.8 is hard to find , but i will recommend 1 lens heavy yes, built like a tank yes, but delivers great pictures on M4/3 the Tamron BBAR 135 F2.5 Adaptall2 (03B). To my knowledge not a very expensive lens either.
     
  8. ean10775

    ean10775 Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 31, 2011
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Eric
    Another vote for OM Zuiko Auto-T 135mm f/2.8

    In addition it has a built in hood.

    I've had mine for a while, using it on both a Canon EOS 350D and 5DmkII, though I just used it on my E-PL1 for the first time last night. (Indoors at 3200 ISO no less) I'm pretty happy with it.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Alexander92

    Alexander92 New to Mu-43

    1
    Oct 17, 2010
    What about the Canon FD 135 F2 Quite rare i think but maybe it is cheaper than a leica lens..
     
  10. apicius9

    apicius9 Mu-43 Veteran Subscribing Member

    441
    Feb 1, 2010
    Philadelphia, PA
    I didn't have Oly on my radar, so that's something I will have to look into, thanks for the tip. I was thinking about the Canon FD 135/2 but that seems hard to find. Has anybody tried a Sonnar 135/2.8 on m4/3? I have a number of really nice 150mm c-mount lenses that are not bad at all, but my favorite, the Schneider 150/3.3, is a hunk of metal and glass and also comes in at over a pound in weight, even though it reasonably compact.

    I will keep looking but keep the Oly in mind.

    Stefan
     
  11. Keep in mind that the FD 135/2 is a monster of a lens as well as being expensive and hard to find but having said that I'd still love to see one working on a m4/3 camera.
     
  12. Wlodek

    Wlodek Mu-43 Regular

    38
    Feb 19, 2011
    BC, Canada
    SMC Pentax-M 120mm F2.8 is a very god lens. Not too large and a high quality construction.
     
  13. f6cvalkyrie

    f6cvalkyrie Mu-43 All-Pro

    Feb 12, 2010
    Brussels, Belgium
    Nikkor 135/2.0 is an excellent lens, but may be heavier or more expensive than you want to carry or spend.

    C U
    Rafael
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.