Which 4/3 lens(es) will fill a niche?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by New Daddy, Sep 12, 2013.

  1. New Daddy

    New Daddy Mu-43 Regular

    Jan 24, 2011
    With EM-1's PDAF, legacy 4/3 lenses will gain new appeal.
    Which ones are likely to fill a void or niche left unfilled by micro 4/3 lenses?
  2. juangrande

    juangrande Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Dec 2, 2012
  3. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    Depending how serious folks are, there are a couple of interesting possibilities.
    14-54/2.8-3.5 - medium-aperture standard zoom
    50-200/2.8-3.5 - long tele-zoom
    150/2.0 - fast telephoto (especially with the 1.4X teleconverter)
  4. flipmack

    flipmack Mu-43 Veteran

    Mar 23, 2012
    irvine, CA
    I'm a HUGE fan of the ZD 35/3.5 macro. I keep an E-1 body just for that lens.

    Sent from my Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet using Mu-43 mobile app
  5. hkpzee

    hkpzee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Sep 5, 2011
    Hong Kong
    Definitely the 50-200/2.8-3.5 for me!
  6. Clint

    Clint Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Apr 22, 2013
    San Diego area, CA
    11-22mm F2.8-3.5
    12-60mm F2.8-4.0
    14-35mm F2.0
    14-54mm F2.8-3.5 II
    35-100mm F2.0
    50-200mm F2.8-3.5
    90-250mm F2.8
    150mm F2.0
    300mm F2.8
    OLYMPUS :1.4x Teleconverter EC-14
    OLYMPUS : 2x Teleconverter EC-20
    Extension Tube EX-25
  7. dougjgreen

    dougjgreen Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 5, 2013
    San Diego
    Doug Green
    For sure, this is the main beneficiary, along with the 150mm f2. - One of these sold on ebay in June for just over $1000. Now, good luck getting one for anything close to $1500.

    Others that will find new life are the 12-60mm, 11-22mm, 14-54mm, and maybe even the older 40-150mm f3.5~4.5

    What I'd really like to see tested is the difference in AF performance between the mk I 14-54 and 50-200, and the mk II versions of these lenses. Especially because nowadays, the mk 1 50-200 is selling used for about $300 less than the mk II, and they are optically just about identical, the only difference is the internal focus motor on the mk II, which made a big difference on the Olympus DSLRs.
  8. CliftonBowers

    CliftonBowers Mu-43 Rookie

    Sep 3, 2013
    ya its for sure 50-200 for it amazingly on to it
  9. kenez

    kenez Mu-43 Regular

    Apr 18, 2012
    I posed this same question to Pekka Potka on his blog and this was his response:

    Thanks for the info. Here's one thing I haven't seen addressed. I understand that the camera automatically switches to phase detection AF for 4/3 lenses and contrast detection AF for m4/3 lenses. What does it do for those few 4/3 lenses that have been optimized for contrast detection like my 14-54mm mk II? Thanks!

    Ken: according to Olympus with all FT lenses it is PDAF only. CDAF is not fast enough with any of them.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.