considering that the 45/1.8 is to be released soon, does that leave room for a m4/3 version of the 50/2 ? according tot the lens roadmap, an Oly macro was scheduled, not a portrait lens. While the 45mm looks great, why would anyone buy it if a fast macro lens can do portraits too? confused.. EDIT: found relevant thread in the native lens forum. please lock/delete this post. thanks!