For many years I only ever used my manual focus OM system. For the past few years I have experienced nothing but frustration from the automatic focus of the cheap point and shoot digital I adopted. Now, contemplating getting a MFT camera I have been reading around trying to understand when and how a properly implemented AE system might be useful. (I'm wondering whether I will be wanting any native lenses apart from the 20/1.7 pancake.) I had to laugh at this article 5 Situations When Manual Focus is Better than Auto Focus so thought I might open it for discussion. Reading the article, I am struggling to think of any situation that would not fall under at least one of the points listed in that article . I would have thought moving targets would be a prime instance as these were always amongst the more challenging ones for me with manual focus... but apparently not! So, those of you who can competently manually focus -- when do use AE?
Depends on what conditions you tend to photograph in I guess, but with an autofocus lens I would only use MF on the rare occasion that the AF can't do the job, which for me would be less than 1% of the time. MF always feels like an afterthought on modern lenses and doesn't really encourage me to use it. The fly-by-wire focus rings on 4/3 and m4/3 lenses have never felt quite right.
I should also add that I come from a background of Canon DSLRs which don't tend to have many autofocus issues even in low light, so I tend to have good faith in autofocus systems.
The only time I use manual focus is when trying to take motorcycle racing pics. The auto focus on the G1 isn't good enough for fast moving stuff, so I just manual focus on to a section of the track, and with a healthy aperture try and shoot the bikes.
I have found that shooting through glass doesn't appear to be nearly as bad a problem with CDAF as it was with PDAF
As I age autofocus has a greater appeal to me, in fact it is about the only automatic thing on the new cameras that has become my "crutch." I still manual focus for three things, macro photography, zone focus photography and hyperfocus photography.
I like auto focus just fine. I don't shoot macros as a rule, so no need for MF there. I don't shoot a lot of action but AF seems good most of the time when I do. I tend to use MF in two situations. One, when I'm setting the camera for hyperfocal shooting, which I often do on the street. And two, when I"m using a legacy lens for low light indoor portraits. And this is just because its what's available. If there was a good 50mm f1.4 or f1.5 native m43 lens with auto-focus, I'd buy it and let the AF do its thing. There aren't though, so I use a legacy version of that lens (perfect for low light candids) and deal with the manual focus. I don't mind it - I did nothing but manually focus for many years - but I love auto focus when it works and it works more and more often as it gets better and better. -Ray
