What should be the next Panasonic "Leica" lens?

sfmurph

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
75
Location
San Francisco
Now that the 100-400 lens is out, what do you think should be the next Panasonic-Leica lens?

I recently added the 15mm f/1.7 to the 25mm f/1.4, and I really like the new design language on the 15. I would hope that they update the 25 to include that, and maybe be a bit thinner like the 15. I'd also like to see a m4/3 optimized 50mm f/2 Summicron in the same style (and hopefully in the same price bracket and not way up there like the Nocticron).

What do you think?
 

wjiang

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
7,764
Location
Christchurch, New Zealand
Now that the 100-400 lens is out, what do you think should be the next Panasonic-Leica lens?

I recently added the 15mm f/1.7 to the 25mm f/1.4, and I really like the new design language on the 15. I would hope that they update the 25 to include that, and maybe be a bit thinner like the 15. I'd also like to see a m4/3 optimized 50mm f/2 Summicron in the same style (and hopefully in the same price bracket and not way up there like the Nocticron).

What do you think?
67.5mm f/2 OIS WR macro?
 

tkbslc

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Messages
7,667
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
It's unlikely given the PL15, but the system still needs a smokin' 35mm equivalent lens. Maybe a 17.5mm f1.4 that is just stellar optically?

Or maybe a really high end, sealed PL 12-100 f3.5-5.6 to go with the 100-400? Guess they just did the 12-60, though, so prob not.


67.5mm f/2 OIS WR macro?

Sounds nice, but based on the PL45, that would have to cost USD $1900 wouldn't it? :)
 

DHart

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
3,592
Location
Scottsdale, Arizona
Real Name
Don
12-50mm f/4 constant aperture, premium quality lens would get my money.

The recently announced 12-60 looks like it will be a very good lens, but I'd prefer a GREAT 12-50 f/4.

I would also buy a 7mm or 7.5mm f/4 premium quality rectilinear prime lens with AF. The 7-14 f/4 lens is great, but I always shoot it at 7mm, so I might as well have a great 7mm prime.
 

bahamot

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
569
Real Name
Irwan
Maybe I'm sound crazy, but I might buy any FL with nocticron IQ and built quality.
 

Catch22nm

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 10, 2015
Messages
98
how about a 10mm 1.7 Prime , to compete with the 12 2.0 which is already pricey and been around forever. Just make it as small as possible (slightly bigger than the 12 2 is ok) It would be in my bag for astro and epic night / low light landscapes and general wide angle use. (yes I know I can use a fisheye but I dont want to. why you ask. because I am doing astro shots from inside old ruins and defishing does not always play nice with architecture. )

then they could have the
10 1.7
15 1.7
20 1.7
25 1.4
 
Last edited:

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,533
Location
Canada
An 8 or 9mm rectiliniar prime. The smaller the better. Panasonic, Leica, Olympus, I don't care who...but someone needs to make one. :D
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom