what photography related item did you buy this week?

wes camino

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
22
Real Name
wes camino
I bought an Olympus om-d e-m10 mark i which had only 1400 shutter clicks from EBay for $159.00 (USD). I've been out with it twice, since. Am very pleased with it. I previously owned the PL5, PL7, and PM2. All great cameras.
 

Zapp DJR

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2020
Messages
673
Location
southern Poland
Real Name
Darek
Not this week, but a few weeks ago - 12-100 f/4 on Oly discount day.
This week - two Sony SD Tough 32GB 300/299 on sellers discount.
 

Petrochemist

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,285
Location
N Essex, UK
Real Name
Mike
I saw a Linhof Multifocus viewfinder listed for £5.50 (including postage) and couldn't resist, even though I'm not sure how useful I'll find it on my 5x4 monorails.

I thought it was a bit of a bargain but it's only after it arrived that I did a quick search for info on it. It seems the latest version is £950 (new and having an added rangefinder function) & there's an earlier used version for sale from MrCad for nearly £200. :eek: Perhaps I should revise my estimate of its value up a little :2thumbs:
 

Zapp DJR

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2020
Messages
673
Location
southern Poland
Real Name
Darek
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Stanga

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Oct 16, 2016
Messages
1,314
I bought an outdoor swing chair cover to cover my astro mount when I leave the mount outside for whatever reason. I was getting fed up of setting the mount up on consecutive nights. Couldn't leave it uncovered due to the weather in England.
 

DaveJP

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
74
Location
Kingswinford, UK
Real Name
David Plumb
Almost exactly four weeks ago I posted on this thread saying I'd just purchased an Olympus 12-100 f4 Pro zoom lens. I'd deliberated for some time about this lens, as it wasn't something I needed (I already have the Oly 12-40 f2.8 and the Pan 35-100 f2.8), but so many photographers seem to love it and sing it's praises, so I wanted to know if it would suit me. I had two weeks to decide whether to keep it or return it for a full refund. I sent it back!

The 12-100 is a very versatile lens; it's very sharp, and the stabilisation, particularly with the EM1 Mk3, is exceptional. But, for me, it was just too big and too heavy. It was a relief to go back to my 12-40 and not have the size and weight of the 12-100 pulling the camera down all the time. After all, I changed from full frame to Micro 4/3rds to get away from that sort of thing. So why have I just purchased another lens; this time one that is even bigger and heavier than the 12-100 ... the Olympus 40-150 f2.8 Pro zoom?

For me, the difference between the 12-100 f4 and the 40-150 f2.8 is simple; the 40-150 doesn't have to stay on the camera all the time. With the 12-100 there is really no respite; it's designed to cover pretty well all the focal lengths I might need, so was on the camera constantly. With the 40-150, I'll still use my 12-40 for most of my shooting, only changing to the longer lens when required. It's a heavy lens, but I don't mind the weight if it's in my bag on my shoulder.

I look upon the 40-150 as a specialised lens; when I need the extra reach it's there, otherwise the smaller, lighter 35-100 will suffice with no loss of speed. I'm really appreciating the long range of this lens, and I'm even thinking of getting the MC-14 converter to give me the occasional option of a 56-210mm zoom. This lens will definitely not be going back!
 

Darmok N Jalad

Temba, his aperture wide
Joined
Sep 6, 2019
Messages
1,028
Location
Tanagra (not really)
Real Name
Randy
Almost exactly four weeks ago I posted on this thread saying I'd just purchased an Olympus 12-100 f4 Pro zoom lens. I'd deliberated for some time about this lens, as it wasn't something I needed (I already have the Oly 12-40 f2.8 and the Pan 35-100 f2.8), but so many photographers seem to love it and sing it's praises, so I wanted to know if it would suit me. I had two weeks to decide whether to keep it or return it for a full refund. I sent it back!

The 12-100 is a very versatile lens; it's very sharp, and the stabilisation, particularly with the EM1 Mk3, is exceptional. But, for me, it was just too big and too heavy. It was a relief to go back to my 12-40 and not have the size and weight of the 12-100 pulling the camera down all the time. After all, I changed from full frame to Micro 4/3rds to get away from that sort of thing. So why have I just purchased another lens; this time one that is even bigger and heavier than the 12-100 ... the Olympus 40-150 f2.8 Pro zoom?

For me, the difference between the 12-100 f4 and the 40-150 f2.8 is simple; the 40-150 doesn't have to stay on the camera all the time. With the 12-100 there is really no respite; it's designed to cover pretty well all the focal lengths I might need, so was on the camera constantly. With the 40-150, I'll still use my 12-40 for most of my shooting, only changing to the longer lens when required. It's a heavy lens, but I don't mind the weight if it's in my bag on my shoulder.

I look upon the 40-150 as a specialised lens; when I need the extra reach it's there, otherwise the smaller, lighter 35-100 will suffice with no loss of speed. I'm really appreciating the long range of this lens, and I'm even thinking of getting the MC-14 converter to give me the occasional option of a 56-210mm zoom. This lens will definitely not be going back!
The 40-150 2.8 is an incredible lens. It packs some weight, but boy is it sharp. Ironically, it's the default lens on my EM5.3, but I have primes for when I want super-light weight. I went with the MC20 with mine, which will come in handy for winter bird shooting. With the relatively short min focal distance, you can do a lot with 40-150 2.8. It's my butterfly lens-of-choice.
 

DaveJP

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
74
Location
Kingswinford, UK
Real Name
David Plumb
Yes Darmok, I'm impressed with the close focusing capabilities of the lens. That was also a feature I liked about the 12-100. I normally use my Olympus 60mm macro lens for butterflies and other insects, but the high magnification and extra working distance that the 40-150 affords will be really useful for skittish subjects. I've sent for an MC-14 converter and will play around with that for now. However, I may invest in the MC-20 later as well; it seems a really simple and lightweight way of increasing the range to 300mm, and I believe the IQ is very good too.
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,581
Location
Oregon USA
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
I've had the 35mm f2.4 for 18mths or so and use it very lightly. I mainly got it because the Sigma 17-35mm f2.8 that came with my K-7 seemed very soft but now I realise it was probably just the K-7 being a K-7. I knew there was a 50mm DA out there too but was fine using the manual-focus 50's (I had a K-mount and M42-mount Pentaxes).

Anyway, I saw another eBay bargain and picked up a 50mm f1.8 DA - super cheap & almost obnoxiously budget-build (just like the 35mm) but the pics seem fine. Its weird because I'd struggle to think of an original manufacturers lens that feels this cheesy in Nikon or Micro-Four-Thirds land (maybe the Oly body-cap lenses?). Will slap it on the K-5 and see how it performs - ultimately its the pics that count.

View attachment 848251_9210055 by Walter Kernow, on Flickr
I just tried out a KP with the 35mm f2.4 - optically the lens seemed very decent. But man, that build quality. The only MFT lenses I can think of that would be similar are toy lenses. Even the budget Olympus 17mm f2.8 is vastly better feeling.
 

Carbonman

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
2,598
Location
Vancouver BC
Real Name
Graham
I've sent for an MC-14 converter and will play around with that for now. However, I may invest in the MC-20 later as well; it seems a really simple and lightweight way of increasing the range to 300mm, and I believe the IQ is very good too.
I have the 40-150 Pro and both the 1.4x and 2.0x TCs. Image quality is excellent with either teleconverter.
 

CD77

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Messages
2,001
Location
Burnley, UK
Real Name
Chris
Winter is coming and further lockdown restrictions look like they are going to be imposed so I'm bulking up on my kit for portraits, indoor macro and still life shots to ease the boredom! I've bought a new tripod that allows the camera to be slung underneath (as well as above), a softbox with honeycomb grid, and a 5-in-1 reflector.
 

Panolyman

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
1,196
Location
Wild West Wales
Real Name
Brian
Just done a deal on an E-M5 Mk2 (to complement the M5-Mk1 and my E-M10 Mk2).
Now got to get rid of the Lumix G2 I bought last month, and possibly my G7.
 

Panolyman

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
1,196
Location
Wild West Wales
Real Name
Brian
So, I ordered this yesterday and it arrived this afternoon.
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


After charging the battery, I just had time to slap the 17mm f1.8 lens on and nip outside to get this.
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



SOOC, and apart from selecting aperture priority, I've no idea what was set in camera.
It's a used body with around 8,000 shots and seems in pristine condition, was boxed, with all the accessories.
Not bad for £300 methinks.
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,581
Location
Oregon USA
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
So, I ordered this yesterday and it arrived this afternoon.
View attachment 851512

After charging the battery, I just had time to slap the 17mm f1.8 lens on and nip outside to get this.
View attachment 851513


SOOC, and apart from selecting aperture priority, I've no idea what was set in camera.
It's a used body with around 8,000 shots and seems in pristine condition, was boxed, with all the accessories.
Not bad for £300 methinks.
Not bad at all, that body seems matched perfectly for either the 17 1.8 or the 25 1.8.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom