Wanting to replace aps-c kit- Need kitbuilding help

Discussion in 'This or That? (MFT only)' started by Catz, Aug 8, 2013.

  1. Catz

    Catz Mu-43 Regular

    25
    Aug 8, 2013
    Tromsø, Norway
    Hey
    First post here. I am the owner of a classic though uncomplete aps-c kit. I have a canon 60d, tokina 11-16, tamron 17-50 and a canon 28-200. I want to replace this kit with something smaller with better iq.

    I shoot stars and aurora, landscapes, action, wildlife and general travel images(portraits)
    Budget: 1500€ for starters.
    I need help to be pointed in the right direction. Thanks!
     
  2. wildwildwes

    wildwildwes Mu-43 Veteran

    456
    Jun 9, 2012
    Brooklyn, NY
    Hi Catz,

    Welcome! Hope you enjoy hanging out here!

    My advice given your budget constraints would be to buy an Olympus OM-D body... Lens-wise (ha ha, no pun intended) I'd recommend the Lumix 20 & Olympus 45. Both are superb lenses (fast, SHARP and compact). That's a great start...

    Cheers! :th_salute:
     
  3. BigTam

    BigTam Mu-43 Top Veteran

    853
    Mar 19, 2012
    Dortmund, Germany
    Ron
    I agree with the E-M5, but as you seem to be a zoom type, I would recommend:

    For the 11-16, get the Olympus 9-18. Not cheap, but an excellent lens.

    For the 17-50, get one of the 14-42/45 kit zooms. Use the search function to find comparisons.

    For your 28-200, an equivalent would be the 14-140 superzooms, but that would break your budget, so I suggest the Olympus 40-150. This lens performs well above its modest price.

    You would have 3 zooms covering 9-150, ie 12-200 in aps-c terms, and a kit which willkeep you happy for a long time.
     
  4. Catz

    Catz Mu-43 Regular

    25
    Aug 8, 2013
    Tromsø, Norway
    Thanks guys!
    I have looked at both the omd and the 9-18, but i am thinking about buying one or two primes instead of the midrange zoom. Any recommendations? And I want something longer than 145mm for wildlife.
     
  5. BigTam

    BigTam Mu-43 Top Veteran

    853
    Mar 19, 2012
    Dortmund, Germany
    Ron
    Both the Panasonic 20 and the Olympus 45 are tremendous value for money, excellent IQ.

    My kit doesn't have a midrange zoom either, never missed it. I have the 45 and the 17 1.8, the latter my 'almost always on' lens.
     
  6. monk3y

    monk3y Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 14, 2013
    in The Cloud...
    Steven
    The 45mm f/1.8 is probably the best bang for the buck if you want a good prime for portrait.

    As a wider angle prime I only have experience with the 17mm f/1.8 (my most use lens) but people are also raving about the pana 14mm and 20mm.

    For longer lens, again I havent used this but the cheapest and apparently the best bang for the buck option is the Oly 40-150mm that comes as kit in some cameras. It's cheap with good feedback.


    Sent from my GT-N7100 using Mu-43 mobile app
     
  7. BeyondTheLines

    BeyondTheLines Mu-43 Veteran

    277
    Sep 23, 2012
    Spain/USA
    Patrick
    If the Oly 40-150 isn't long enough there's the Oly 75-300 II (or the Panasonic 100-300 but if you have an E-M5 the IS becomes redundant) but that will be more expensive
     
  8. monk3y

    monk3y Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 14, 2013
    in The Cloud...
    Steven
    I was thinking he meant 145mm on aps-c... if he meant 145mm on m43 then yes the 75-300mm is a good choice :)

    Sent from my GT-N7100 using Mu-43 mobile app
     
  9. BeyondTheLines

    BeyondTheLines Mu-43 Veteran

    277
    Sep 23, 2012
    Spain/USA
    Patrick
    I wasn't sure since all this equivalent focal lengths can get get confusing when talking about different formats so just to be safe I included the Oly 75-300 =)
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.