VSCO vs NIK

Steven

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,599
Location
USA
I want to get an add on to Lightroom that will help me quickly get to a more interesting image point . I can go further from there, but I feel like I need help and can save a lot of time by getting some presets or something of that nature. I like what I see from VSCO. I understand NIK also has some presets . I know it also has a lot of other powerful features. I played with a standalone version briefly a few years ago. However, I understand that VSCO adjustments are all in Lightroom, where NIK takes you out of Lightroom loop and adjustments are not recorded in Lightroom. Is that correct?
I feel like VSCO may be better for my purposes right now, but NIK seems like a better deal. Can anyone add some thoughts on this dilemma of mine? :smile: Thank you.
 

mattia

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
2,391
Location
The Netherlands
NIK works best in photoshop, where the adjustments go to layers. LR just exports it to NIK and gets the file back. I don't have any experience with VSCO, but I'm not interested enough in film emulations to spend that kind of money on VSCO. NIK suite is much better value for the really broad range of excellent tools you get.
 

mcasan

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
1,665
Location
Atlanta
Use Perfect Photo Suite which does things on layers and masks. When you finalize the image in the Suite it can send it as a PSD with layers back to LR.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I've got the full Nik Collection, got it for free actually, as I bought Nik Silver Effects Pro years ago and then Google bought out Nik and offered the lot for free, but that's another story. I've also got Perfect Effects 8 (free again) and to be honest, Nik is a lot better. Nik works in both LR and PS, and stays resident in each program, so you don't have to jump from one to the other. I use the Nik software a fair bit, but not Perfect Effects.
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,212
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
I will say perfect effects does a fine job as a standalone app. Haven't tried Nik at all though.
GX1•17/2.8•30/2.8
 

WendyK

Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
1,566
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Wendy
You can try Nik for free for 15 days, so why not give it a try. I did and after a few days I bought it. So many great things in that package.
 

emorgan451

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Messages
208
Location
Western North Carolina
I've got the full Nik Collection, got it for free actually, as I bought Nik Silver Effects Pro years ago and then Google bought out Nik and offered the lot for free, but that's another story. I've also got Perfect Effects 8 (free again) and to be honest, Nik is a lot better. Nik works in both LR and PS, and stays resident in each program, so you don't have to jump from one to the other. I use the Nik software a fair bit, but not Perfect Effects.
I was about to start a new thread asking about Perfect Effects 8 vs Nik plugins, but I figured it would fit in with this thread. I've tried the Perfect Effects 8, but I find it pretty cumbersome (my machine is kinda old so that may have a big effect) and also the files are huge afterwards. I really like the effects that people get from using Nik in their workflow and thought about downloading the trial when I do a shoot (trying to time the trial period right) but I don't have any clue how cumbersome it would be. How do you think they compare? Is Nik's input back to LR a tif that's huge as well?

I'm trying to strike the right balance between how much time I spend processing each photo and achieving the result I want. I also wonder if something like Trey Ratcliff's lightroom presets would serve me better. Has anyone had any experience with those?

If this is too off topic I can start a new thread.

Thanks,
Eli
 

zlatko-photo

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
228
I highly recommend Totally Rad Replichrome I and Replichrome II. They work within Lightroom like VSCO, but I prefer the look.
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,212
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
Perfect Effects has been good to me, but you really do need a fast machine with a lot of RAM to have any sort of good experience with it.

As for the filesize, it will be huge if you import the file as a TIFF or PhotoShop file. Which if you do, you'll still need a program to convert the file to jpeg, if I understand the program correctly. I usually import jpegs, so the output is easy to use without further ado.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I was about to start a new thread asking about Perfect Effects 8 vs Nik plugins, but I figured it would fit in with this thread. I've tried the Perfect Effects 8, but I find it pretty cumbersome (my machine is kinda old so that may have a big effect) and also the files are huge afterwards. I really like the effects that people get from using Nik in their workflow and thought about downloading the trial when I do a shoot (trying to time the trial period right) but I don't have any clue how cumbersome it would be. How do you think they compare? Is Nik's input back to LR a tif that's huge as well?

I'm trying to strike the right balance between how much time I spend processing each photo and achieving the result I want. I also wonder if something like Trey Ratcliff's lightroom presets would serve me better. Has anyone had any experience with those?

If this is too off topic I can start a new thread.

Thanks,
Eli
I don't save the files I work on as PSD, just JPG, so the files aren't large. I've tried to use Perfect Effects 8 many times and I just can't warm to it; it just doesn't seem as flexible and 'nice' as Nik. It's a bit difficult to describe, but I much prefer the Nik plugins.
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,212
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
My best recommendation for Perfect Effects is to watch the tutorials on the site - once I grasped the idea of stacking filters, and how you can adjust individual filters, paint in and out areas of the photo on individual filters, and adjust filter opacity, a lot clicked into place. Now I just wish it was a more full-featured editor, with things like crop, export options and the like, but I get that that's not the purpose of the program.

Does Nik offer export tools and things like horizon/crop?
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I use Nik in the most simplistic fashion, but since it produces PSD files and works within PS, I assume that it can do whatever.
 

wanderenvy

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
154
I got Ratcliffe's plugins in a moment of weakness. They have their pluses and minuses, depending on how much you like to cook your image.

And it goes without seeing that Ratcliffe likes to cook.

The presets seem better suited for landscapes, not surprising since that's what he does. There are a few that I will like to try out on environmental portraits to see how the resulting color toned image shows up. The results are pretty attractive sometimes. But again, if you are looking to keep it 'natural', these are not for you.

The biggest plus with the presets is that they show you what is possible with the image file. Many of the changes are fairly aggressive, and leverage Lightroom controls in non intuitive ways. This changes the image much more than what I would do starting from the default raw.

So these days, when I have a shot that falls short of being good naturally, say good composition and expressions but messed up exposure, I will try one of my favorite presets. (I ignore about 90% of them)

If I get something interesting, the next step is to start UNDOING whatever the preset did step by step, until I get a compromise that looks less cooked to my eyes but still retains some of the changes that made it interesting.

~W
 

ptan55

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
46
Location
Amherst, NY
The nice thing about Nik is that you can set a control.point and adjust.just the area under the control point instead of the whole picture.
 

cueball

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
57
Location
Oklahoma
I highly recommend Totally Rad Replichrome I and Replichrome II. They work within Lightroom like VSCO, but I prefer the look.
This... I also have the Nik suite but can't speak to VSCO. These days it's few and far between that I don't start my edits with one of the Replichrome presets.
 

OldRadioGuy

Enthusiast Amateur
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
72
Location
Austin, Texas USA
Real Name
Bob
The nice thing about Nik is that you can set a control.point and adjust.just the area under the control point instead of the whole picture.
You can do the same thing with onOne Perfect Photo Suite 8, but with masking. (Control points are really overlays for masks, and at least some of the standalone versions of the Nik products allow the user to look at the masks.) I now use Perfect Photo Suite 8 a lot after reviewing their YouTube videos. The suite includes a browser and batch processing.

The Google Nik plugins appear to be aimed at Photoshop and Photoshop Elements users, although they include standalone versions that are a little bit quirky. In the Windows version, HDR Efex Pro, for example, puts its output files in the Windows Documents folder. No way to change that.

Bob
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I'll take back some of what I said about Perfect Effect 8. I've been playing around with it a little more and there are some features that are handy. It seems that there is not one ideal product and each one has strengths and weaknesses. It's a bit like having to have a set of metric and AF spanners and sockets, as there isn't any worldwide standardisation on nuts and bolts.
 

dav1dz

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
926
Location
Canada
Replichrome: 2 preset packs that covers most of the professional print and colour reversal films.

VSCO: 5 preset packs now (potentially more) that also covers consumer and instant films.

My decision was swayed by the fact that VSCO gave instant savings to returning customers. The looks are all the same for the films they have in common.

Trey's presets are all looks that he likes. They're not the same as film emulation presets. These are probably the easiest to create on your own.

Nik and all the other stuff mentioned are all plugins. They will likely require an export-import for edits and are often done with a convert to TIF or PSD first.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom