Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Olympus Cameras' started by goldjim, May 8, 2011.
Does anyone use a high quality UV filter on their lenses for protection?
Yes I use a UV filter on all my lenses, for protection.
However as I've said here before I don't believe there is any difference between those regarded as "high quality" and the rest. Consequently I use whatever I've got in a draw.
I've got KOOD filters on Leica lenses and despite scutinising the images intently at 100% on a 27" iMac screen cannot for the life of me see any difference whatsoever between them and filters costing up to 10X as much.
Nor am I able to see any difference whatsoever between using a filter and no filter. So rather that scratch my lens I use a filter which I can replace easily and cheaply, unlike the lens.
Its also a lot easier and safer to clean a filter than it is to clean a lens.
I do most of the the time. But sometimes I notice that the filter is causing a glare, especially on the 20mm lens indoors or at night, and I take it off.
Do you notice the glare before you take the picture, or only afterwards?
I find that framing through an LCD screen will give you a more accurate representation of flare because you're looking at the image as the sensor sees it. Through an optical SLR viewfinder I find flare is less obvious and shows up differently to how it appears in the final image.
Before, in the LCD.
I use a UV filter on all my lenses. It's most convenient for me because if I have to do any cleaning, it's to the filter and not the front element, saving me from potentially damaging the front element or getting oil smudges or anything else unwanted.
From the filters I've used, I don't see much of a difference between expensive and cheap multi-coated filters in my photos, but I do have one single coated UV filter and I get bad flare every once in a while that I don't get when using the MC filters under the same conditions.
Ah yes, the hood vs filter for protection debate
Here's an interesting read for you...:smile:
--> Best of the photography forums - tutorials: Cheap filters and Bokeh .
If I'm using a $1800+ lens then yes, I use high quality UV filters... never know what might hit the camera in a professional environment.
But m43's? When my lenses cost me 200-600 at most in all honesty- I'd prefer not to have the extra bulk, and cheap UV filters in front of my lenses. I do, however use c-pol's and other filters from time to time.
Other than that, clear as day, and even a slight scratch on any lens wont kill its quality to an extreme. Cameras are meant to be used, not babied.
I've got one on all my lenses, just for protection. They add little weight and as others have suggested, they are better for cleaning and for general protection. I wouldn't feel right without one!
The cheaper ones do cause issues. They can cause a haze like effect on the photos. So when I use a haze filter, I use high end ones. B+W or Tiffen HT to minimized any issues.
I've certainly never found that.
They found a difference here:
More Hoya filter comparison tests!
I have, and recently saw example of eBay quality filters on a l lens, and it was clear as day the haze it cause to the image.
My first photo teacher taught us HIS theory... the less between the image and the film, the better. That always seemed to make sense to me.
I figure that goes for a sensor as well.
If you want less worry with your lens getting dirt and scrathes, use a filter.
But once you use a filter, I'd say get a good one with MC. You don't want a poor quality filter ended up affecting your shots quality. Better to go without a filter in that case.
Here are some form a dedicated sport shooter with high end glass. Went to a cheap filter and the results were not what he normally posts. The haze is visible.
Bishopscourt Bikes - Steve's Digicams Forums
This is his more normal results without el cheapo
ISB Kirkistown, 4th Sept. - Steve's Digicams Forums
So you're going to get a Pinwide, and start shooting everything with that, right? :tongue:
To Filter or not......
Some time ago I started a thread "To filter or not, that is the question".
It's a pretty good read....
Please consider disabling your ad blocker for our website.
We rely on ad revenue to pay for image hosting and to keep the site speedy.
Or subscribe for $5 per year to remove all ads and support our efforts.