Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Panasonic Cameras' started by The Minimalist, Nov 26, 2012.
Has anyone have any experience of using this 4/3 lens on a :43: camera?
I'm using a GF1.
I had one until the 12-35 came out. It won't AF at all on a GF1. It is GLACIALLY slow on the newer cameras that will AF it (G3 in my case). It is giant and quite heavy, I got into the practice of holding the camera by the lens with my left hand.
I never thought the IQ was outstanding, but it is certainly very good. The range was nice and the OIS worked well, but the 12-35 is absolutely better in every way, and, IMHO, worth the price.
To give you an idea of how much bigger it is, by replacing it with the 12-35, I was able to carry a backup body in the same bag as used to be fully occupied by one body and range of lenses.
I should add that if you already have one, it is absolutely worth buying the adapter for and using it.
If you are looking to buy one, I would suggest looking at the Olympus 14-54 II which is optimized for CDAF, or just saving up for the 12-35
The one that I had was great in terms of IQ; very sharp and distortion seemed to be very minimal at the widest angle which is rare for a 28mm equivalent zoom. The problem was that it felt terrible to use on a Micro 4/3 camera due to the mismatched size and weight and the noisy and slow autofocus. It felt much nicer to use on an Olympus E-510, and even now if you gave me the choice to use it on either the E-M5 or the old E-510 I'd take the latter.
Thanks for the replies, I have seen a Panasonic L1 with one of these lens for sale, I might just stick with the P14-45 that I've got.
Please consider disabling your ad blocker for our website.
We rely on ad revenue to pay for image hosting and to keep the site speedy.
Or subscribe for $5 per year to remove all ads and support our efforts.