unexpected solution

dixeyk

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
3,475
I have been using my EPL-1 and various lenses in producing digital walking tours for a local wilderness area. Visitors to the park can download the tour to their music player or phone and they can have it with them while they walk the trails. It has closeups of birds (that most folks likely will never see because they are tiny high up in the trees and brown) recording of calls and in a few sections some images of things of interest that cannot approach easily or at all due to restrictions or terrain. It was the core project of my Masters and the folks I did it for were pleased so I am doing 4 more for them.

I used the EPL-1 to capture video and stills (as well as a few P&S cameras I have and using creative commons and public domain images as well). Of the different equipment I've used the EPL-1 has been great because it is easy trek around with, image quality is terrific and the video much better than I expected it would be. I'm sure any of the other Pen models or Panasonic equivalents would also work well.

On my next project I need to do some closeups and macros (insects and flora) and I started looking for a decent solution. The 14-42 kit lens is pretty good but I needed to get closer. I wanted AF as what I am doing is not true macro I just need to get close and sometimes stuff is in a place where manual focus might not be feasible (like me hanging off a branch upside down). I started looking at the Olympus FT 35 and 50 macros then I realized that for $200+ I might be able to go another way and get some more flexibility.

I picked up a used Panasonic LX3 (I'd used one a few times so I know roughly what to expect). It gives me AF, decent closeup, good image quality, very good video and AF. I even get WA at 24mm that my collection of lenses doesn't give me. I'm looking forward to putting it through its paces. I'll let everyone know how it works out.
 

shoturtle

 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
823
If you have the 40-150 or 45-200, a canon 500D close lens would give you almost 1:1 macro with AF and metering. And it is 65 dollar for the 58mm 60 for the 52mm
 

dixeyk

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
3,475
If you have the 40-150 or 45-200, a canon 500D close lens would give you almost 1:1 macro with AF and metering. And it is 65 dollar for the 58mm 60 for the 52mm
That's a great idea. I think the compact will still work better for tight spots but that might be a great addition as I have the 40-150.
 

DHart

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
3,538
Location
Scottsdale, Arizona
Real Name
Don
Absolutely! You're going to love what that little LX3 will do for you!

I just picked up an LX5 and I'm amazed at the ease of making awesome close-ups with the camera. With the 24mm equiv. f/2.0 lens you get some great shallow DOF images as well (when you're really close to the subject). It's now my go-to camera for quick and easy close-ups!

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

shoturtle

 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
823
And if you want super macro and very thin dof for tripod the canon 250D gives more the 1:1 macro. But very very hard to work with hand held as you need to be at f16 or better to control the dof.

Here are some of my close up handheld shots with the 45-200 and 500D close up lens. Could have getting in tighter, but would have needed a tripod.

Some Close up's from Chiang Mai, Thailand - Steve's Digicams Forums

That's a great idea. I think the compact will still work better for tight spots but that might be a great addition as I have the 40-150.
 

dixeyk

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
3,475
I also have the ft 35mm 3.5 with the ft adapter. It a nice little macro lens for things that will not up and leave on you.

EPL-1 Macro test with oly 35mm 3.5 - Steve's Digicams Forums
I used to have the 35/3.5 FT lens (sold it). It was great in good light. For the $ that a decent used one would cost however the used LX3 gives me a bit more tools to work with. For the end product I am creating the quality of the LX3 will be more than enough.
 

shoturtle

 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
823
I got mine on ebay for 110 dollars, it is not to expensive when they pop up ;)

It is a good little lens, and the 70 dollars I paid for the panny adapter made the setup a steal vs the pl 45mm. I just could not see spending that kind of money on a short macro lens.

I like that lx3, it a good little camera.
 

DHart

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
3,538
Location
Scottsdale, Arizona
Real Name
Don
I agree.. for a great many close-up situations, you just can't beat the LX3/LX5 and the like. They're ideal: very quick and easy to use, with outstanding results.
 

mclarenf3

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
243
Location
Canada
Absolutely! You're going to love what that little LX3 will do for you!

I just picked up an LX5 and I'm amazed at the ease of making awesome close-ups with the camera. With the 24mm equiv. f/2.0 lens you get some great shallow DOF images as well (when you're really close to the subject). It's now my go-to camera for quick and easy close-ups!
And here's my XZ-1 with a photo of a Windows keyboard. Gotta represent the other camps! :biggrin:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Attachments

dixeyk

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
3,475
The XZ1 looks REALLY interesting. Perhaps when the wallet feels fuller :eek:
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom