Ultra-wide panasonic or olympus

bashar

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
49
I am lusting for an ultra-wide lens, olympus will release there 9-18 soon and the Panasonic lens 7-14 looks awesome, other than the price difference, do you think the upcoming olympus lens will be on par with the panasonic?! speculations, speculations?! so far panasonic has better lenses despite olympus long history in the making....
 

cosinaphile

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,123
Location
new york city
the panny is a much more robust lens, faster a constant f4 , much wider

the 9-18 oly will have a commendably small size but will have the flimsy build quality of the collapsible oly kit zoom and will be slower at one end of the zoom range by a stop [5.6]


i wanted the 9-18 but the price gouging by olympus has put me off this lens
 

wilson.c

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
38
I've got the Lumix 7-14 and am quite happy with it, it's a bit pricey though. You can shoot building interiors as well as super wide landscapes with your m4/3 camera. Here's a few test shots from with my GF-1.

Wilson
 

Attachments

Glenn S

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
791
Nice pics Wilson C. Last two are Stanley, right?

I love my 7-14 :smile:
 

bashar

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
49
very nice photos, i am still surprised that olympus has not sent any lens samples to the press for reviewing considering that they will be selling them in 10 days from now!
 

Stillie

New to Mu-43
Joined
Apr 26, 2010
Messages
1
Hi Wilson

I am looking to buy the 7-14 mm lens, do you have any other photos like say landscapes you could post to the forum?
Thanks
Alan
 

vincechu

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
176
Location
Cheshire, United Kingdom
Wilson thanks for sharing the photos of Hong Kong - makes me miss HK more now :'(

back to the topic, if you check out DP Reviews review of the 9-18mm Olympus, they say its pretty much on par with the Panasonic lens. So based on that I would go with either lens but consider if the constant f/4 aperture or very slight extra width of the Panasonic lens is important to use and if it is, can it justify the higher price?

Finally from experience, the panasonic lenses have always seemed to be better built than the Olympus ones, which feel abit too plastic for my liking
 

pxpaulx

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
1,265
Location
Midwest
Real Name
Paul
back to the topic, if you check out DP Reviews review of the 9-18mm Olympus, they say its pretty much on par with the Panasonic lens. So based on that I would go with either lens but consider if the constant f/4 aperture or very slight extra width of the Panasonic lens is important to use and if it is, can it justify the higher price?

Finally from experience, the panasonic lenses have always seemed to be better built than the Olympus ones, which feel abit too plastic for my liking
A couple of things I wanted to point out. The constant aperture is nice, but not as much of a necessity for wider focal lengths - the primary point of constant aperture zooms is to work in conjunction with a flash, or to have more available light at all focal lengths to be able to get a sharp photo. With the former, UWA photography doesn't lend itself well to flash (too much of an area for most flashes to expose properly, unless you want to highlight a particular subject within the frame). Having a fast lens for wider angles isn't as necessary either since the general rule for getting a sharp photo is 1/focal length (even less if you have IBIS with an oly camera) - in the case of these lenses you could shoot at 1/15th and 1/20th shutter speeds and expect reasonably sharp photos (give or take based on the photographers ability to keep steady!).

I definitely agree between these two lenses for most the primary factor ends up being the cost; I happened to get the 7-14mm for a good price, but otherwise would have gone with the 9-18mm - for size (though the 7-14 is quite small as well), and filter threads.

Oh one other thing, the difference between 7mm and 9mm is a significant amount - every mm on the wide end accounts for alot of area fitting into the frame. (there are several threads with examples over at dpreview)
 

pcake

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 3, 2010
Messages
187
don't think it's fair to call it gouging. sure, it costs more than the oly, but it's a much faster lens.

the panny is a much more robust lens, faster a constant f4 , much wider

the 9-18 oly will have a commendably small size but will have the flimsy build quality of the collapsible oly kit zoom and will be slower at one end of the zoom range by a stop [5.6]


i wanted the 9-18 but the price gouging by olympus has put me off this lens
 

Streetshooter

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,138
Location
Phila, Pa USA
I just got the new 9-18.
True, it's not the fastest lens out there but it is very compact. It focuses fast and accurate even in very low light. With the IS in the Pens....I don't really care about slow speed/low light issues. Besides, the high ISO makes up for a world of sins.
The did it with this lens. It's just great and will live on one of my bodies for a long time...
 

arpoador

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
173
Location
san francisco ca usa & rio de janeiro br
Got back from a trip to Eastern Malaysia. I'm a bit disappointed with the performance in a back light situation and causes a lot of flare.
Interesting.
This image was shot directly into the sun (at sunset) with the 9-18 Oly. To me, the flare seems rather well controlled. I should add that I had it on Program mode, and the camera chose f/9 as the aperture.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

dyao

New to Mu-43
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
9
looking at the specs today I noticed that the Oly is half the weight of the Panny...
 

PeterB666

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
780
Location
Tura Beach, Australia
Real Name
Peter
The lens does have very good control of flare and certainly better than say the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 which is surpirsing considering the 9-18mm lens has a far more complex element design.

This is about the worst I have managed and I was deliberately testing the lens for flare...

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

nokiamia

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
102
Location
Malaysia
it's frustrating that we don't have much choice in wide angle zoom lenses other than these 2, which are comparatively expensive. and i've not begun talking about ultra wide fixed focus lenses. i hope sigma, tamron or tokina would make one soon.

i guess, it must have been either very hard to make 'shrunken' lenses or makers still think that the market is not big enough.
 

pictor

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
637
it's frustrating that we don't have much choice in wide angle zoom lenses other than these 2, which are comparatively expensive. and i've not begun talking about ultra wide fixed focus lenses. i hope sigma, tamron or tokina would make one soon.
None of these lenses is cheap, but at least the Olympus is reasonably priced. However, IMHO the 7-14mm, which costs nearly twice as much as the 9-18mm, is rather overpriced (at least in the part of the world where I live).
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom