1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Thoughts on the Zuiko ED 40-150?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by crashwins, Dec 9, 2012.

  1. crashwins

    crashwins Mu-43 Regular

    132
    Oct 13, 2010
    Northampton, MA
    Hi folks. Always get my impressions from the folks here before pulling the trigger on a lens. I have a good trade offer for the m43 40-150mm. How is it as a zoom? I'd love it for portraits - any experience from folks in that area? Thanks!
     
  2. fin azvandi

    fin azvandi Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 12, 2011
    South Bend, IN
    I don't have the 40-150 but am thinking of picking one up, it seems to be a decent tele zoom. I would think that for portraits the max aperture of 4-5.6 may be a little limiting at times unless you're working with flash, but I'd also like to hear about actual experiences.
     
  3. nickthetasmaniac

    nickthetasmaniac Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 11, 2011
    Tiny, light, cheap and sharp enough, even wide open (which it needs to be, cos wide open isn't particularly wide...) I love mine as a travel zoom - just don't expect too much from it :smile:

    The shots below were all taken on an unstabilised GH2, so I guess movement would have been an issue for the sailing shots. Still, I'm pretty happy with the output!

    5945043147_f44ed31624_b.

    5945599252_1dcb41d2a8_b.

    5904841624_2af85a2cc1_b.

    5660217053_3a09b3f792_b.

    5844219319_fae1214a82_b.

    5844217289_3c072d09c4_b.

    5844215437_7cca82abf8_b.

    5844213031_faa73879ac_b.

    5844210165_8be52ab09c_b.

    5645302699_4d69820895_b.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  4. Mercurio

    Mercurio Mu-43 Veteran

    253
    Jul 17, 2012
    Bogotá, Colombia
    Mauricio
    Trying to catch some action with the 40-150...
    All images from RAW without PP.

    From the EXIF: ISO 200, 58 mm, f/4.5, 1:320
    PA060008.
    E-M5    ---    58mm    f/4.5    1/320s    ISO 200


    From the EXIF: ISO 1250, 92 mm, f/5, 1:1250
    PA060057.
    E-M5    ---    92mm    f/5.0    1/1250s    ISO 1250


    From the EXIF: ISO 320, 123 mm, f/5.3, 1:500
    PA060120.
    E-M5    ---    123mm    f/5.3    1/500s    ISO 320
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. sokar

    sokar Mu-43 Veteran

    394
    Nov 30, 2011
    EPM1 with MMF2 + ED 40-150mm @ 120mm

    Grandfather.
    E-PM1    OLYMPUS 40-150mm Lens    119mm    f/5.3    1/80s    ISO 1600
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. BigTam

    BigTam Mu-43 Top Veteran

    860
    Mar 19, 2012
    Dortmund, Germany
    Ron
    I have some shots with the 40-150 in my gallery:

    https://www.mu-43.com/gallery/u9471-bigtam-page1.html

    Specifically, the portrait of my father (more a snapshot).

    For portraits with out-of-focus backgrounds, outdoors is fine if you can find a background far enough away.
     
  7. crashwins

    crashwins Mu-43 Regular

    132
    Oct 13, 2010
    Northampton, MA
    Great. Thanks everyone for the input. Looks like it's a pretty capable little lens and definitely worth adding to the stable. Thanks!
     
  8. battleaxe

    battleaxe Mu-43 Top Veteran

    A bit related is the R variant worth the extra $30-50(depending on where you look) over the non-R version?
     
  9. fin azvandi

    fin azvandi Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 12, 2011
    South Bend, IN
    From everything I've read the R version just has cosmetic changes to the barrel (color, texture, etc), otherwise it's the same lens internally. That said, I do like the look of the R one more...
     
  10. Robstar1963

    Robstar1963 Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 10, 2011
    Isle of Wight England UK
    Robert (Rob)
    There is no significant benefit with he R version - identical optics and unless you are bothered about the 'looks' then the saving in cost is worthwhile with the standard non R
    The R in my opinion is also a bit more 'plasticky' and lightweight feeling than the older non R
    Regards
    Rob
     
  11. battleaxe

    battleaxe Mu-43 Top Veteran

    I take it the size is the same, most of comments I read about two never really mentioned if size was different. Some also said the R works faster on newer m4/3, and af is a bit more quite when recording video. Is that really the case?
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.