Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by GBarrington, Dec 21, 2014.
I just bought a cheap c-mount APS-C 50mm 1.8 lens for adapted use. It's actually pretty darn sharp in the center and improves once stopped down. I wouldn't be surprised if this lens was actually decent.
I have the original one from canon and it is not that useful as you can not control the aperture. It is like a fixed 1.8, good for some things, not for everything.
Unless there is some trick to stop it down that I do not know.
Get a adapter with built in aperture, you can find them on ebay.
Yeah, except the aperture in the adapter leads to poor optical performance. The location of the iris in a lens design matters - a lot. Using an external iris in the adapter increases lens aberrations. Example:
Buying one to put on a speedbooster, probably not to actually use it but rather to see how degraded an image I can make before it becomes useless by putting sandpaper to it.
Sort of a cheap lens to use for sandpaper torture tests, who is with me?
With the wide range of classic manual focus 50mm's I don't really see the point, is the EF 50 pretty much the same as the FD one anyhow? But given there are a ton of M42 FD MD and L39 50's that can be had for a couple of drinks with no issue stopping them down it seems a lot of work to get it to work. I am keen on the FSU Jupiter 8 and the Helios 58mm both are pretty direct copies of old Zeiss designs with bags of character.
Well, he asked for adjusting the aperture, and using the Nifty fifty i dont think imagequality was the number one prio here
OK, good point! Personally though, I think I'd avoid EF for adapted lenses. There are a whole bunch of 50/1.8 lenses to be had for very cheap that would be easier to use I think. Getting an adapter with an iris in it just to use the Nifty Fifty feels like it might be a bit self defeating :smile:
Not to mention the EF adapters with apertures cost just as much as an even better legacy 50mm f1.4 does in the first place...
Please consider disabling your ad blocker for our website.
We rely on ad revenue to pay for image hosting and to keep the site speedy.
Or subscribe for $5 per year to remove all ads and support our efforts.