I have been an adapted lens shooter for several years now and as such have been using Sony and Fuji camera (primarily for the larger sensor and smaller crop). With my eyesight not what it once was I have been thinking for getting back into native lenses. I love the Fuji lenses but the cost is a bit prohibitive and I am not a fan of the Sony lenses. I do remember really liking the Panasonic P20, P14 and PL 45/2.8 macro quite a lot. To that end I have been thinking I'd like to pick up another m43 body again. Originally I was more a fan of Panasonic bodies but I have been looking at the Olympus OMD E-M10 as they are going for very good prices this holiday season (and kind like the design) and I was wondering if folks see any huge disadvantage of going for the older E-M10 as opposed to the newer mark II (about $150 difference)? I ask because I just came off of selling my NEX 6 for an a6000 only to find that I didn't like the a6000 at all.