Tempted by the GF1

Hard to say. My Gf1 and 20mm complement a 5D, and I really enjoy the camera. I particularly appreciate the fast, accurate AF and the easy to use controls.

if you can justify it and don't need to borrow to purchase, then what's to lose...?

 

Hi Razer,

I've heard two views on this... one being that the GF1 has such similar controls to the G1 that it's easy to use as a 2nd cam, another being that there isn't enough difference (just form factor) to justify buying an (in some ways inferior) copy of the G1.

Can you get a chance to try the GF1 for yourself?

Cheers

Brian

 

Is Mathers of Lancashire anywhere near to you?

Cheers

Brian

 

Hey Razer,

I agree with Brian, pop across to Mathers - I have purchased a lens and EVF for my GF1 from them, they have knowledgable and friendly staff and usually have a stock of GF1's with or without lenses at probably the cheapest prices in the UK.

Definately worth the 45min drive to handle one.................bet you buy it though!

Cheers,
Ian

 

i think the user experience of the ep1\gf1 form factor does justify having both,

although both are technically mirrorless,for the g1 the position and good quality of the evf translates into a user experience that is essentially slr- like ,i think , whereas the rangefinder svelteness of the gf1 will make it more likely to be a grab and go machine and with a small prime less intimidating to subjects as well.

and of course they are backups for each other as was said above.

 

Hi Razer,

One of the first things I noticed when using the GF1+20mm for street work is that compared to the 5D+24-105mm I used to use is that now someone may give me a quick glance but they soon lose interest.

The 5D used to draw attention and make people look or even move away, the GF1+20mm is so small that in most cases people appear to be uninterested in my actions or just think I am photographing something else.

It is a great combination for street work.

Good luck with your decision and I suspect once you have tried the GF1 you will be hard pushed to give it back!!

 

Precisely my experience - except that my photos aren't as nice as his... :smile:

 

I agree with the comments about Mathers. They're very helpful. I called in to get a 20mm but ended up with an immaculate ex-demo GF1 + 20mm for £469.00 They couldn't sell it as new because they lost the box! What a bargain.

 

Interesting thread. My problem is the opposite.

I am in the position of kicking a Nikon D200/300 outfit into touch and getting a G1 to compliment my GF1.

At the moment I am only keeping the Nikon as a wide angle camera. yes I know about the 7-14mm but it's too OTT for me. The 10-20mm Sigma would be good but I don't think it's 100% compatable with the GF1 ( G1?) Then there is the forthcoming 9-18mm from Olympus but impatience kicks in. At the moment I feel all at sea. Mind you yesterday the man in Mathers also got a bit mixed up with Macro/ Micro and Macro as in close focussing. Yesterday I bought the 14-45mm, really just for the 14mm end. O..K. it's slow but F3.5 with IS and 400 ISO certainly will equal my beloved 28mm F2.8 Elmarit with FP4 rated at 200 ASA. 

At the present time I am trying to decide between the G1 or a Nikon D90, a decision which would be easier if the latter had the lovely G1 swivelling LCD.

And re the 14-45mm. I have always looked down my nose at " kit" lenses, however this little package is a cracker, and that IS thing certainly does make up for the F3.5 thing. I think the present combo will hold the GF1 outfit 'til the 10mm f1.4 prime comes out.

I would also endorse the positive comments re Mathers, very good to deal with, just like the old day's.

Brian.

 

I got rid of my D700 outfit, just to big and heavy to lug about.

I still Have an E3 with several fourthirds lenses which will go on my EP2 if I wish.

My EP2 with Panny 20/1.7 will however fit in my fleece pocket and is more likely to be carried around with me

 

I like many others on this forum have gone the route of getting rid of big heavy bags full of DSLR kit and trading in for small effective micro 4/3rds.

I recently purchased a great small robust camera bag from a shop selling camping/mountaneering kit - the shop was called Kathmandu and the bag has a front pocket for mobile, passport, pens etc and a zip up padded section that can easily hold my 14-45 / 45-200 / Metz 36AF4 / spare battery and GF1+20mm in full ever ready case all in an inconspicuous blag bag that is about 12" x 9".

If I just want an "always with me job" the GF1+20mm in ever ready case fits nicely into my side coat pocket - small, efficient and easily accessible with great results - I love it!

 

Nearely three years ago I bought the D200, never took it out.........too big. Then and if you can fathom out the logic I bought a D300 hoping it would waken my photographic interest. Did it? Did it hell. The D300 has less than three hundred clicks- all of my dog, the kitchen and my Mini. Never been further than the end of my drive- and I don't live in Blenheim Palace. 

But the GF1 is certainly pushing the right buttons. I would get rid of my DSLR stuff if only there was a decent wide angle for it, the 7-18mm is OTT for me and so slow. Maybe Olympus will come up with something. So until then the Nikon gear isn't going for walkies, it's just some sort of safety blanket.

O.K. I can at a pinch put my 12-24mm Nikon zoom on the front but it's huge, it defeats the whole object and guessing the aperture isn't very sophisticated.

Brian.

 

Brian

used prices for the D300 are really good

I don't intend to sell mine, but I did notice on Ebay that D300 used prices are good, especially "low mileage" models

The 12 24 is always sought after

Cheers

 

Bill the trouble is as I said I am of an age where giving up on the Nikon is a very big step.

In 50 odd years of photography I was loyal to Leica for 40 years. ( still am if truth be told and Rolleis) Failing eyesight and specs forced a move to F3 HP Nikons for 6/7 more, then digital introduced me into auto focus and all that goes with it. Since then my interest has gone down and down, I loath the modern gear. Now and again I still get a Leica or a Rollei off the shelf and start getting wicked thoughts.

But then the GF1 came along and it is so close to being ideal that the few shortfalls assume monumental proportions. If only they would produce a wide angle and a 45/50mm prime dedicated to the cameras capability,they already have the superb 20mm, they can chuck the video stuff that would be great. Clip-on optical viewfinders and the camera left to do the twiddly bits, great.

You will note from my list most of my lenses are small primes so another alternative might be to chuck the Nikon bodies and buy a D90. The D90 is a superb camera and not that much bigger than the G1, certainly a lot smaller and lighter then the D200/D300. In fact writing this has made me think that the D90 might be the way to go, at least I have the lenses and they all work with the camera without any faffing about with adapters. In fact the G1 makes no sense at all...............Blast!!!!!!!!!I do love that swivelling LCD  

Decision , decisions. Still it's better than worrying about global warming.

Brian.