Telephotos 45-150 or 45-175?

Discussion in 'This or That? (MFT only)' started by wlsinwi, Apr 16, 2013.

  1. wlsinwi

    wlsinwi Mu-43 Rookie

    15
    Mar 1, 2013
    Which is better?? Does the newer 45-150 have better IQ? It is more compact and manual but is it better. The 45-175 has power OIS and is X series. They can run about the same cost if you settle for a used 45-175.
    Which should I get for my GF5??
     
  2. juangrande

    juangrande Mu-43 Top Veteran

    805
    Dec 2, 2012
    COLORADO
    They probably have similar IQ. I've never had the 45-150, but I do have the other and like it a lot. I had the olympus 40-150 and think the 45-175 beats that as far as contrast/color. It can be problematic @ 1/80- 1/200 sec with blurring caused by the shutter. I do not have that problem using it with my OMD.
     
  3. wlsinwi

    wlsinwi Mu-43 Rookie

    15
    Mar 1, 2013
    After doing some research I found an interesting detail. The 45-150 has a 52mm filter thread. Filters in this size are expensive, like over $50. The 45-175 uses a more standard 46mm filter which are much less expensive. What I might save on the lens I will have to spend on the filters. Point in favor of the 175
     
  4. ivoire

    ivoire Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2011
    Naperville, IL
    mike
    I had them both at one time. The 45-175 is still with me, 45-150 is long gone.
     
  5. dav1dz

    dav1dz Mu-43 Top Veteran

    926
    Nov 6, 2012
    Canada
    52mm is just as standard of a filter thread as 46mm. Don't let that be a deciding factor. Bigger filters costs more.
     
  6. fluberman

    fluberman Mu-43 Top Veteran

    504
    Sep 19, 2012
    Indonesia
    Alex
    Eventhough the 45-150 is more compact, it is extending when you are zooming, while the 45-175 is not.
    I don't have the 45-150 so I can't compare the IQ, but I use my 45-175 on GX1 and OMD. The images from OMD is sharper, while from GX1 sometimes some blurring occur at certain shutter speed. I don't know if this problem is isolated only on GX1 or it may happen to GF5 as well.
     
  7. jyc860923

    jyc860923 Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Feb 28, 2012
    Shenyang, China
    贾一川
    the 45-150 is a low profile but performs well. I've never touched a 45-175 so can't make a comparison but I know the Mega OIS on the 45-150 is very helpful so I don't think with the PowerOIS there's more to gain. Actually I read a thread said that the PowerOIS wasn't as effective as Mega OIS.

    Anyway I think 45-175 is more suitable if you shoot more video.
     
  8. dd1

    dd1 Mu-43 Regular

    61
    Sep 9, 2011
    I haven't had the 45-150, I bought the 45-175 to replace an Oly 40-150 and the 45-175 was an improvement in every way.

    I haven't had the 1/80-1/200 blurring issue that some on the Internet say happens with this lens, used with a G3 and GF2.

    AF, colour, contrast and sharpness, are all excellent with it.
     
  9. dwrk

    dwrk Mu-43 Regular

    69
    Aug 10, 2012
    The new 45-150 looks better than the 45-175 at the wide end...at the long end the PZ has a sharper core

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  10. zethanos

    zethanos Mu-43 Regular

    104
    Apr 20, 2013
    Singapura
    ZR Li
    Maybe you can take a look at the images from the native lenses sample archive to compare the IQ to see what is good for you. :) 
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.