1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Telephoto choice

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by Hoddy, Dec 17, 2014.

  1. Hoddy

    Hoddy New to Mu-43

    Dec 17, 2014
    I have just acquired a Lumix G3 with kit 14-42 lens and am looking to buy a telephoto to use.

    Is there much difference in the IQ between the Panny 45-150 and the 45 -200 and is the "X" series 45-150 worth the extra money from an IQ point of view? The extra range of the 45 -200 is not really relevant to me (I'd be happy with anything from 100mm upwards) I dont do any video either.

    Any help or alternative suggestions welcome although I do really want a lens with IS.

  2. bigal1000

    bigal1000 Mu-43 Veteran

    Sep 10, 2010
    New Hampshire
    They are all consumer grade lenses I doubt there is any real difference.....
  3. flamingfish

    flamingfish Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Nov 16, 2012
    Just curious -- any reason you're not looking at the Pana 45-175? When I was researching lenses, people seemed to like it a little better than the 45-200. I got the 45-175 and like it, but haven't had the opportunity to compare it with either of the lenses you mentioned.
  4. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Mar 13, 2014
    Central Ohio, USA
    I've got the Oly 40-150 and like the IQ very much for what it is. You might be more happy with a Panasonic lens only for the simple fact of the OIS in the lenses.
  5. Hoddy

    Hoddy New to Mu-43

    Dec 17, 2014

    No reason, just forgot to mention it!
  6. RevBob

    RevBob Super Moderator Subscribing Member

    Jun 4, 2011
    NorthWestern PA
    The PL 100-300mm is an awesome lens with IS. May be a bit pricey, but I really love this lens.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Tadgh78

    Tadgh78 Mu-43 Regular

    Feb 25, 2013
    I have both the panasonic 45-175X and the 100-300. The latter is the more powerful telephoto of the two obviously as its nearly twice the focal lenght of the former. At 100mm 100-300 will also shoot at at least half a stop wider apperture than the 45-175, meaning a higher shutter speed can be used reducing the chances of camera shake blurring the photo.

    For me 300mm is often still isn't enough reach for the kinds of subjects I like to shoot (wildlife mostly). However if really all you need is 100mm then I'd go for the 45-175 every time. It's is a far smaller lens (about half the size) and a more practical one to carry around. It also zooms internally which is nice and makes it feel just a bit more solid. I feel it can just about serve as general purpose lens albeit a rather narrow one. You won't miss a portrait shot because you have the 45-175 on your camera. The same can't really be said for the 100-300mm.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.