I spent most of my photographic life using manual lenses with no image stabilization. Now we see comparisons between shots that are taken with no whole image stabilization turned on and with image it image stabilization turned on and the difference is just phenomenal. the one with no image stabilization is absolutely unusable the one with image stabilization is a phenomenal picture. I just don't know how I could've gone 50 years most of that shooting with cameras and lenses that had no image stabilization getting some pretty good pictures. now due to the stabilization if we turn it off which basically gives us a set up that I shot with her most of that 50 years we don't seem to be able to get a good picture. And I just don't understand how that difference could be so phenomenal. Am I alone in that or does anybody else agree with me.