Some thoughts on the G9, 12-35, 14 f2.5, and 35-100 f5.6


Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Nov 18, 2013
I am still in the process of filling out my lenses (aren't we all:blush:) and thought I'd look at my primary walk around lens on the G9 12-35 and a lens that is always in my LowPro top loader with my second G9 and the PL100-400, and a lens that is in my Gx85 travel kit (I have three bags ready to go).

Because I shot images of medicine labels I won't post the images here, and everyone tests differently. I shot the 12-35 / 14mm at f2.8 and 5.6 @ ISO800 and 2000, and the 12-35 /35-100 f4/5.6 @ 5.6 @ 35mm ISO 800.

I could not tell the difference, and of course the G9's IBS is amazing as is the little 35-100 on the G9. On my 50" 4K TV I could not see a difference even at 100%. I know there maybe some sample differences but I was amazed how well these two inexpensive (especially used) lenses are render the type on the labels and a few other details of items also on the counter.

I expect to spend a bit of money this year on two lens to complete my "A" system, but for those who are not as fortunate I can highly recommend these two lenses on performance. In fact I have the GWC1 for the 14mm and would recommend that if you can find one for reasonable dollars used (make the 14 somewhere between 10.5 and 11mm at f2.5 - great museum setup).

My travel kit is normally my Gx85/OLY's 9-18/75-300II. However I would be very happy for an in city trip with the 35-100 with either the Gx85 & 9-18 or the G9 and the 12-35.

As uncertainty over the photographic industry is rising, Don't look past the bargains that can be found in the M43 "consumer" lenses - even those that are discontinued.


Mu-43 Veteran
Jan 17, 2018
My travel kit is normally my Gx85/OLY's 9-18/75-300II.

I occasionally shoot the same setup (GX85 + 75-300ii). Wonderful results but it is the small body ergonomics in particular that drive me towards considering a body of G9's proportions! Get a more sure grip on the combo -- which on GX85 is not heavy by any means --- just a tad disproportional. :)


Mu-43 Veteran
Aug 6, 2019
The Panasonic 35-100 f 4-5.6 is really a bargain for the mid telephoto range. My copy is very sharp across the zoom range, tiny, I pair it with my bar- of- soap E-PM1 for my walk around kit. If you like that focal length range, and you like tiny, you owe it to yourself to check out out.

Latest threads

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji:
Forum GIFs powered by GIPHY:
Copyright © Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom