So why don't Olympus just.....

Discussion in 'Accessories' started by flash, Aug 6, 2013.

  1. flash

    flash Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Apr 29, 2010
    1 hour from Sydney Australia.
    Gordon
    make one of these between 4/3 and m4/3.

    LA-EA2 : Shooting : NEX Accessories : Sony Australia

    Wouldn't that solve all the 4/3 legacy lens issues? It's less than a 1/2 of a stop of light loss with PDAF focusing. I think the SHG lens owners would be all over this. No?

    Gordon
     
  2. stratokaster

    stratokaster Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jan 4, 2011
    Kyiv, Ukraine
    Pavel
    They will simply add on-sensor PDAF to the next OM-D.

    BTW, there was some speculation that Olympus may do exactly that (i.e. make an adapter with some sort of beam splitter) back in 2011, but everybody said it was not a practical solution because their sensors at the time were quite awful.
     
  3. Clint

    Clint Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Apr 22, 2013
    San Diego area, CA
    Clint
    We'll see next month, if the rumors are accurate.
     
  4. goldenlight

    goldenlight Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 30, 2010
    Essex
    John
    Their sensors have never been awful, just "less good" than the competition. :biggrin:
     
  5. carpandean

    carpandean Mu-43 Top Veteran

    827
    Oct 29, 2010
    Western NY
    Even Sony is apparently going away from the transparent mirror technology. On-sensor PDAF makes it obsolete. I assume that's what we'll see on the new OM-D.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
HLD-7....why so heavy? Accessories Dec 13, 2014
Tripod advice - don't know where to start Accessories Dec 10, 2013
My GX1 strap (and why it's no good for EM5) Accessories Mar 17, 2013
Why do hoods have vents on the side? Accessories Jan 31, 2013
Why no teleconverters for Micro Four Thirds? Accessories May 24, 2012