So I have narrowed down my choices. Now i need help to pick just one

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by colbycheese, Mar 26, 2014.

  1. colbycheese

    colbycheese Mu-43 Veteran

    378
    May 1, 2012
    Way up there.
    So i have narrowed down my lens choices. I am looking for the best value lens that can be used indoors in low light and is reasonably sharp.
    The choices are:
    1. Sigma 60
    2. Panasonic 20
    3. Olympus 17

    So what lens of these 3 best matches the criteria?
     
  2. T N Args

    T N Args Agent Photocateur

    Dec 3, 2013
    Adelaide, Australia
    call me Arg
    Pana 20. But you have the Leica 25/1.4, surely that meets the criteria, is free (to you), and makes the Pana 20 seem lesser value to you because it is only slightly wider.

    The Siggy is a bit long for indoors, the Oly is a little higher priced.
     
  3. colbycheese

    colbycheese Mu-43 Veteran

    378
    May 1, 2012
    Way up there.
    Ok. I am also looking for something lighter than the Leica 25 because it is easier for me to handle. Which one is the lightest?
     
  4. DoofClenas

    DoofClenas Who needs a Mirror! Subscribing Member

    Nov 9, 2012
    Traverse City, MI
    Clint
    A used panasonic 20mm mk1 is a decent value...but the af drives me nuts sometimes. I'm thinking of picking up a used 17mm myself. Other than the wonky af in low light conditions, it's a spectacular lens.
     
  5. speedandstyle

    speedandstyle Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Indoors and you have a short tele on your list? The Sigma 60mm is a short telephoto lens and would be hard to use inside a house unless you like really close-up shots. Since you already have the 25mm the 20mm would be a bit redundant in focal length{only a tiny bit wider} but it would be smaller and lighter since it is a pancake. I would think the 17mm would make the most sense for your needs.
     
  6. Wisertime

    Wisertime Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 6, 2013
    Philly
    Steve
    Get the 45 F1.8. I use the 75 indoors...don't think 60 is too long. YMMV.
     
  7. Duncan

    Duncan Mu-43 Regular

    111
    Oct 31, 2013
    This would be my suggestion also. It's considerably different from the 25 and is a great indoor lens. If not the 45, I'd go with the 17 since that is more different from 25 than is the 20.
     
  8. Biro

    Biro Mu-43 All-Pro

    May 8, 2011
    Jersey Shore
    Steve
    Yeah... if somehow you can afford two lenses, get the Oly 17mm f/1.8 and the 45mm f/1.8. Between these two and your PanaLeica 25mm f/1.4, you'd be totally set for lowlight work indoors with fast glass in full-frame equivalent focal ranges of 35, 50 and 90mm. And if you ever see a good deal on the Panny 14mm f/2.5, grab it. Then you'd have 28mm covered. Great for group shots and a great fit on both your G3 and E-PM1.
     
  9. playak47

    playak47 Mu-43 Veteran

    297
    Nov 4, 2010
    I have no issues with my E-m5 with Panasonic 20mm using the AF light. I used to hate it with my e-pl1 but now I have no issues with it. Af is slow but it will lock focus the first time in a dark room. But 20mm and 25mm are too close of a focal range when you are looking to expand your lens collection.
     
  10. emirabal

    emirabal Mu-43 Regular

    20

    Barely leaves the body.
     
  11. dornblaser

    dornblaser Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 13, 2012
    Chicago-area
    David Dornblaser
    +1
     
  12. dav1dz

    dav1dz Mu-43 Top Veteran

    926
    Nov 6, 2012
    Canada
    It's hard to recommend 20/1.7 as a low light lens. Yes it goes to a wide aperture, but its AF response is poor. If you're used to 25/1.4's AF in low light, you'd be disappointed.

    I see 20 as a great pancake for the minimum profile.
     
  13. demiro

    demiro Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Nov 7, 2010
    Agree. The 17/1.8 and 25/1.4 are noticeably better in low light.
     
  14. Pecos

    Pecos Mu-43 Top Veteran

    883
    Jan 20, 2013
    The Natural State
    17 is a little bigger but faster focusing than the 20. I like mine very much. Great focal length for general use or for indoors.
     
  15. LowTEC

    LowTEC Mu-43 Regular

    17mm for sure, you will be disappointed by the 20 AF speed in low light
     
  16. Wisertime

    Wisertime Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 6, 2013
    Philly
    Steve
    Agreed. The 25 F1.4 pulls off shots I never imagined were possible indoors in low light. Certainly not with my previous 4/3rds lenses/bodies. The EM5 deserves some credit too.
     
  17. mattia

    mattia Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 3, 2012
    The Netherlands
    You have the 25, so the 20 is perhaps a bit close (and horribly slow to AF in poor light, and merely 'slow' under normal circumstances) in terms of focal length.

    Whether you'd prefer the 45/1.8 or th 17/1.8 (or even 12/2.0) depends on whether you want a wider or a tighter perspective. Personally, I really like 17+25 as a focal length combo for indoor low light. Longer gets a bit too long, but can occasionally be fun.
     
  18. Anthonys

    Anthonys Mu-43 Regular

    167
    Nov 17, 2011
    Sydney
    Anthony
    I would vote 17mm 1.8. Sigma 60mm will be difficult for interiors and it's slower. 20mm is a little smaller but tends to have difficulty focussing in low light. The 17mm has a nice metal build too!
     
  19. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Mar 13, 2014
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    From the ones you have listed, the Oly 17/1.8 would be my pick. I's also seriously consider the Oly 45/1.8 as well. A great deal if you find either one used.
     
  20. orfeo

    orfeo Mu-43 Top Veteran

    673
    Sep 27, 2013
    FR
    I vote for the 15mm summilux.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.