Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Nature' started by Phocal, Mar 15, 2015.
They were fun to flip through. They're all great. Sorry, Can't help your decision.
I prefer the second one (14). My reason is due to the fact processing can bring some details of the face/ eyes out while still showing the shake to dry action...
Great sequence all said!
Agree with maritan on #14, if the face details can be brought out. As presently processed, my favorite is 18 because it shows the face well and still shows feathers in fluffed-up positions, even though it doesn't really convey the "shake" as well as the earlier shots.