1. Reminder: Please use our affiliate links for holiday shopping!

SLR Gear Reviews Olympus 12-40 f2.8

Discussion in 'Micro 4/3 News and Rumors' started by Djarum, Nov 1, 2013.

  1. Djarum

    Djarum Super Moderator

    Dec 15, 2009
    Huntsville, AL, USA
    Jason
    • Like Like x 7
  2. tanngrisnir3

    tanngrisnir3 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    594
    Oct 18, 2011
    Hmmmmm.....

    I may have to rethink some lenses I've got and sell them off to fund that bad boy, but I have a sentimental attachment to the deservedly heralded 14-45.

    I wonder if the disparity of 7mm is worth the mammoth difference in lucre?
     
  3. krugorg

    krugorg Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jul 18, 2011
    Minnesota USA
    It doesn't look very sharp, eh? :biggrin:
     
  4. Wisertime

    Wisertime Mu-43 All-Pro

    Aug 6, 2013
    Philly
    Steve
    I look forward to seeing these in the hands of someone who can take a decent photo.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. Armanius

    Armanius Mu-43 All-Pro

    Feb 23, 2010
    Houston
    Muttley
    Panasonic needs to lower the price of the 12-35 if it hopes to sell another one!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. nstelemark

    nstelemark Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 28, 2013
    Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
    Larry
    Based on this testing it appears it is sharper than the 12-60 at the long end. This does not agree with Olympus's published data.

    The 12-60 was tested on the E510, I wonder how the higher acuity sensor in the GX-1 plays into this.
     
  7. Cruzan80

    Cruzan80 Mu-43 All-Pro

    Aug 23, 2012
    Denver, Co
    Sean Rastsmith
    Does SLR Gear take into account the distortion and CA correction that RAWs have embedded, or not? Makes a difference when reading about it, and I can't keep straight which sites do and don't take that into account.
     
  8. Serhan

    Serhan Mu-43 Top Veteran

    533
    May 7, 2011
    NYC
    Yes, their tests are on corrected images. I checked 12-35mm and the distortion is corrected distortion, not 6% that photozone reported and/or the amount that I see with my Microsoft raw viewer.

     
  9. bcaslis

    bcaslis Mu-43 Veteran

    302
    Jul 3, 2011
    Wilsonville, OR, USA
    Brian Caslis
    Looking like a great lens. Looking forward to getting mine.
     
  10. bipinsnair

    bipinsnair Mu-43 Veteran

    310
    Sep 7, 2012
    Herndon, VA
    Bipin Nair
    +1
     
  11. drewbot

    drewbot Mu-43 Top Veteran

    702
    Oct 21, 2011
    Toronto, ON
    But there are so many on eBay for $1k
     
  12. deang001

    deang001 Mu-43 Veteran

    230
    Sep 16, 2013
    Hong Kong
    Dean
    Great review from a well respected site.

    Apart from how sharp this lens is and how fast it focuses, it's close focusing ability, weather sealing and rock solid hood are such bonuses. Vey well rounded lens.

    Olympus did a great job on this one !!
     
  13. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    The review seems to indicate that the 12-35 is similarly sharp, but with more CA and distortion. However, there are no comparison images and no quantitative figures for CA or distortion, so I think the jury is still out.
     
  14. dav1dz

    dav1dz Mu-43 Top Veteran

    926
    Nov 6, 2012
    Canada
    I am just glad Olympus decided to make the PRO category of lenses. This and 40-150/2.8 are signs for great things to come!
     
  15. gcogger

    gcogger Mu-43 Veteran

    342
    May 25, 2010
    UK
    Graeme
    It looks like you gain a fraction more reach, better distortion and CA with the Olympus over the Panasonic 12-35mm. The Panasonic is significantly smaller and has OIS. The prices will probably end up about the same in the UK (the Panasonic is £100 cheaper at the moment, but I'm sure the Olympus will come down a bit).

    It sounds like we have 2 good options, and it's just a question of choosing which compromises you prefer.
     
  16. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    Dara
    Thanks for the link. I really wish SLRGear did a better job of highlighting which of their reviews are comparable (and didn't 'blur units'). But it seems fairly clear that at least vs. the 12-35/2.8, the 12-40/2.8 is more consistent and better in the corners. So that makes one choice easier!
     
  17. jsusilo

    jsusilo Mu-43 Veteran

    233
    Aug 28, 2012
    I picked up mine yesterday night. One thing that impressed me a lot is build quality, it feels really good in you hand, not too mention good looking too on my Silver E-M5! It balanced really well with half-grip of HLD-6. Did few shots outside 3200-ISO OOC RAW, seems very sharp in center at all aperture but less sharp on corners at f/2.8. The close focus magnification @40mm is really good, despite having trio 14/25/45, this lens likely be on the camera most of the time.
     
  18. Shangul

    Shangul Mu-43 Rookie

    10
    Nov 2, 2013
  19. lakemcd

    lakemcd Mu-43 Regular

    176
    May 27, 2013
    Montana
    Gary
    Hey dhazeghi, love that Tamarac camera bag you sold me.
     
  20. Mellow

    Mellow Mu-43 All-Pro

    Aug 27, 2010
    Florida or Idaho
    Tom
    Not sure what you mean: here's the review for the 12-35mm which includes graphs of distortion and CA: http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1518/cat/all

    A comparison also shows that the 12-40mm has sharper corners at nearly all apertures, although central sharpness is comparable at some. Really, it's not even close. I handled a 12-35mm and fell in love with it--always hoped to get one someday, if I could find a great deal--but, honestly, the 12-40mm looks just so much better.

    To be honest, both are too big for what I like to do, but dang that IQ is something else.

    Why couldn't Olympus have just priced it at $1499 and I wouldn't be having this temptation?!?