Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Other Systems' started by RT_Panther, Aug 2, 2011.
Sigma SD-1 vs Pentax 645D - David and Goliath? - DigitalRev.com
You don't want to put some words or something to go with your link?
I'm not looking for a debate - this is purely informative :smile:
"On paper, the 645D has the resolving power that would make the SD-1 grow some bowels just so that it could defecate itself in fear."
At least the author is apparently unafraid of making bold rhetorical choices.
Well, I read the set-up and then kept looking for a place to click to see the battle. Am I missing something? Or is it just a set-up and the conclusion is left up in the air?
Along the same lines.. but a bit more interesting IMO:
2010 Mini Medium Format Shoot-out
They threw in the 1ds mark III and Leica M9 as a small format comparison.
Left wanting more as well. Would have been nice to at least see.. compare for yourself type images..
Definitely would have been interesting to have the Leica S system :smile:
I am not quite convinced of the Foveon argument that their sensors have 3x the resolution because of the different layers vs Bayer array.
Seems to me they are clutching at straws trying to justify the amazingly high price.
This will answer many questions:
Sigma SD1 Review
1) Foveon vs Bayer has always ended in a stalemate everywhere that I've seen....
2) The price issue has to do with sensor fabrication. Sigma/Foveon have no other users/customers & they make their own. Not exactly cheap like Sony, Panasonic, and Canon. Oh and Sony, Panasonic, & Canon are MUCH bigger than Sigma/Foveon & thus have more resources available to them...:smile:
I always thought that it was like have 3 images stacked vs. 1 flat image from the other arrays, hence why the Fovean solution was always marketed as better pixel resolving as each pixel is resolved 3 times.
The "complaint" with a Bayer pattern is that it only samples one color at each point on the sensor. The image then has to be interpolated to make each pixel RGB. Since the Bayer pattern is 2 green pixels to one red and blue pixel, spatially a 12 mp sensor is only has 6mp of resolution in green and 3 mp in red and blue. (Sigma accurately should say their sensor is truely 15mp, and their competition is somewhere between 7.5 and 3.25 mp, but that would be a hard marketing pitch.)
However, that is not really the end of the story. The Bayer interpolation is very sophisticated and so you really are not losing that resolution the color pixels would suggest. The advantage of non-Bayer interpolation is not significant in what most folks use cameras for. It does have value, however, in scientific imaging where you are really pushing resolution to where you are trying to get definition in threshold detail at the limits of system resolving power.
To give an example, the following two images where taken with the same camera (click on the thumbnail to see the images). These are 100% crops. The first is with Bayer interpolation. The second is real color--the sensor is shifted by one pixel length vertically and horizontally and separate red, green, and blue exposures are taken over the same point. Your first impression will probably be there is no difference, but look closely at the surface texture and you will see there is little extra resolution in the real color image.
I like the "image/color thickness" of the Foveon sensor....Here are a few images from my Sigma DP2 to try and illustrate...
'The Color Of Foveon X3' by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr
SDIM0185 - '1967 Shelby AC Cobra' by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr
SDIM0214 - 'San Antonio Museum Of Art' by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr
SDIM0194 - 'MG Cars' by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr
SDIM0206 - '1974 Corvette' by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr
SDIM0277 - 'Dodge Challenger' by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr
SDIM0255 - 'Ford GT' by RedTail_Panther, on Flickr
Oh man.. do bad Sigma hasn't been doing enough with their initial DP concept. So little evolution ;-(
Yeah..per your signature block,
I use my DP2 when I want a certain look but you're correct, it's tough to use it as an only camera..(That's why I also have an XZ-1) :smile:
Personally, I will stick with the 645D.
Please consider disabling your ad blocker for our website.
We rely on ad revenue to pay for image hosting and to keep the site speedy.
Or subscribe for $5 per year to remove all ads and support our efforts.