1. Reminder: Please use our affiliate links for holiday shopping!

Show your camera

Discussion in 'Other Genres' started by igi, Aug 10, 2010.

  1. igi

    igi Mu-43 Regular

    111
    Feb 24, 2010
    Whatever you have, whatever your using, show it!

    Olympus OM-1N
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oomomo/4879782735/lightbox/"></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oomomo/4880414572/in/photostream/#/photos/oomomo/4880414572/in/photostream/lightbox/"></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oomomo/4879761585/in/photostream/#/photos/oomomo/4879761585/in/photostream/lightbox/"></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oomomo/4879739111/in/photostream/#/photos/oomomo/4879739111/in/photostream/lightbox/"> 4879739111_ee0ea13ef1_z. </a>

    All shot with E-P1 M.Zuiko 17mm F2.8
     
  2. blue

    blue Mu-43 Veteran

    280
    Jun 1, 2010
    UK
    Fairly basic

    g1konica_self_p.JPG
     
  3. texascbx

    texascbx Mu-43 Veteran

    389
    Dec 30, 2009
    Texas
  4. G1 User

    G1 User Mu-43 Veteran

    411
    Jul 20, 2010
    Here is my most versatile one with a Zeiss 50mm f/1.5 C-Sonnar T*
    [​IMG]

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My DSLR with the most used lens (Sigma EX 105mm f/2.8 Macro), I also have a DA 16-45 f/4, Sigma EX DF/DG 24-70 f/2.8 and Sigma APO 70-300
    [​IMG]

    My Film Rangefinder with a Voigtlander 35mm f/1.4 SC Nokton
    [​IMG]
     
  5. JoepLX3

    JoepLX3 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    509
    Jun 13, 2010
    Japan
    Nice lens on that G1!!!

    Can you describe the difference between the Pentax and the m43 camera?
    - I don't mean the specifications, but your applications / feelings

    Why? I am doubting between K-7 and GF1 (or the successor of one of them). I own LX3 and want to upgrade IQ and extent toward portraits (fast prime with effective length between 80 and 120 mm) and also a full range zoom.
     
  6. Vidar

    Vidar Mu-43 Top Veteran

    545
    Dec 31, 2009
    Bergen, Norway
    :smile:
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vidargrov/4114387603/" title="Metal vs. Plastic by VidarFoto, on Flickr"> 4114387603_40a7891736. "500" height="333" alt="Metal vs. Plastic" /></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vidargrov/4685895853/" title="Rolleiflex Automat Type 4 by VidarFoto, on Flickr"> 4685895853_6e9bb8f962. "500" height="375" alt="Rolleiflex Automat Type 4" /></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vidargrov/4295035197/" title="Olympus E-P1 with Voigtlander Nokton SC 35mm 1.4 by VidarFoto, on Flickr"> 4295035197_be91ab8c0d. "500" height="375" alt="Olympus E-P1 with Voigtlander Nokton SC 35mm 1.4" /></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vidargrov/4304052357/" title="Leica M2 + Voigtlander Nokton 35 1.4 SC by VidarFoto, on Flickr"> 4304052357_a409b73c20. "499" height="500" alt="Leica M2 + Voigtlander Nokton 35 1.4 SC" /></a>
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. G1 User

    G1 User Mu-43 Veteran

    411
    Jul 20, 2010
    As far as IQ between the 2, from ISO 100-400, not much of a difference really. The G1 noise is a tad more visible, but not bad at all. I have no problem using ISO 400 for any image. I'd say where the Pentax excels is at making larger photos (above 11x14) at lower ISOs, I don't make prints, so it is not an issue. IQ at ISO 400+.... With the G1, I'd use up to 800, but, understand that you should think about the low level of noise is not objectionable, it's like shooting a fast film. But, in really low light, the color noise may show up more..But easily taken out without any real degrading of edge sharpness.

    Image Quality is really good with m/43 and really usable up to 800 ISO. I just find myself never needing that high ISO... If I shot at ISO 800+ mostly, I'd get a FF DSLR.

    Most of my stuff is from ISO 100-400... Not a problem at all, even with the K20d, I only go up to ISO 640

    If I a shooting something I know will be enlarged like to 16x20, and it will be in low light... I use the Leica M5 with a fast fine grain B&W film, or Color film. I don't own any glass faster than f/2.8 for my Pentax. But I do own fast glass for my Leica.

    I think, for us who take photos in daylight and near dusk or dawn, an m/43 option is fine. A fast adapted lens will extend the versatility indoors without flash. but with 35mm and up with adapted lenses... But, rummer is that a fast native wide angle in about to be released...14mm I think.

    I love the Zeiss 50mm f/1.5 on the G1, it is a great portrait lens. And very sharp, if needed. You will find an m/43 with a fast legacy 50mm will deliver exceptional results..

    The only noticable difference you may find, is that K20d with a sharp portrait lens (I use the Sigma EX 105mm f/2.8 Macro), the finist details like the eyelashes, will have a little better edge sharpness.. But, really, it is not a huge difference, unless you make huge prints for display..even then, only a few on lookers may see a difference (like photography buffs who look at pixels more than overall image impact). Plus., Portraits don't need to be razor sharp, a little softness is good (the women love it).

    Zeiss 50mm f/1.5 C-Sonnar @ f/1.5, no flash

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  8. deirdre

    deirdre Mu-43 Top Veteran

    661
    Aug 9, 2010
    This is it (except for the iPhone 4 I snapped the picture with):

     
  9. igi

    igi Mu-43 Regular

    111
    Feb 24, 2010
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oomomo/4935001665/in/photostream/"></a>
    E-P1 M.Zuiko 17mm

    Another one of my OM1N. Since the start of the rainy days, I've only been doing camera porn photos... and it's not really a bummer:biggrin:
     
  10. Ulfric M Douglas

    Ulfric M Douglas Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Mar 6, 2010
    Northumberland
  11. z0mgitsryan

    z0mgitsryan Mu-43 Regular

    32
    Nov 5, 2010
    Chantilly, VA