Kinda my sentiment - they are just adding an adapter to their existing lens. It certainly is perculiar for them to be bothering the the samsung nx though, as by everything I have read it is kind of a flop. I am guessing their not having made m4/3 mount lenses does in fact have much to do with already have the standard 4/3, and the huge prevalence of available adapters (something the NX probably does not have).They also mention extending to other mounts, including the 4/3... Most of us must have an adapter by now, and I don't see them extend to so many other mounts and not include the m43. Plus, since they are manual lenses, is it really so important ?
I do not know anything about those, are they good for the price ?
Are those statistics related to camera / camera potential?Well of course it is gonna sell like hotcakes in South Korea! You could write samsung on a bag of turd there and it would sell out the first day (maybe not after some user reviews, but...). Well, Maybe I am just bitter because I think they abandoned a large user base moving away from cooperation with Pentax - of course it could be Pentax distanced the relationship themselves as well. you just have to look at all the talk in the 'pentax to join m4/3' thread to see how current and former pentax users would clamor for an evil-type camera.
I like to look at ebay completed listings to get a gauge of how something is selling. The pentax K-x has sold over 60 for as far back as completed listings go (meaning sixty green, actually sold cameras, not the red unsold listings). GF1? 51. E-pl1? 39. NX10? 2.