Range or reach?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by Johbremat, Apr 19, 2014.

  1. Johbremat

    Johbremat Mu-43 Regular

    130
    Dec 5, 2013
    Appreciate there are a few caveats - likely price; size; unreleased - but wonder, would I miss much in 150-300 if I decided to pinch pennies for the 300PRO, or would the 75-300 be a better go?

    I'll definitely be plumping for the 40-150PRO. Just don't know how gutted I'd be having nothing in that gap between.

    For those with the O75-300 or P100-300...how often would you shoot in the middling range (understanding some fall back a bit because end reach can be a little soft)?
     
  2. mattia

    mattia Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 3, 2012
    The Netherlands
    Depends very much on what you're shooting. For most wildlife (safari, off a boat) it was racked out all the way, but sometimes it wasn't. I would not worry too much about 150 to 300 though.
     
  3. Dave Lively

    Dave Lively Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Mar 16, 2014
    What are you going to use it for?

    I use my 100-300 mostly for small birds in my back yard and larger wildlife while on vacation. For this sort of shooting it might as well be a 300mm prime, about 95% of my shots are at 300mm.

    I am planning to buy the 300mm f4 when it comes out but keep the 100-300 too. But my reasons for keeping the 100-300 will be its lighter weight and that OIS works better than the IBIS in my GX7, not the 100-250mm range. I am expecting the Olympus 300mm to end up weighing 2.5 pounds or more. If it somehow ends up weighing less than 2 pounds (which would be VERY surprising) I will probably sell the 100-300 and hope the faster aperture of the 300mm f4 will make up for the loss of OIS.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.