Quintessential Quartet?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by kwalsh, Sep 1, 2012.

  1. kwalsh

    kwalsh Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    827
    Mar 3, 2012
    Baltimore, MD
    Sorry for the sort of senseless post, kind of in a "DPR mood" this morning :rolleyes: 

    So we've got our "holy trinity" in the 12/2, 25/1.4 and 45/1.8. But now we have the 75/1.8 which in some ways out classes all three of those, if perhaps at a focal length less interesting to many. So I can't imagine knocking one of the existing members of the "holy trinity" out to make room for the 75/1.8.

    With that in mind the family has to get a bit bigger and we need a catchy name to refer to it. I'm proposing the Quintessential Quartet. Other thoughts?

    i-4xFJGqB-L.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Fmrvette

    Fmrvette This Space For Rent

    May 26, 2012
    Detroit, Michigan
    Jim
    Thoughts in order...

    1. Why the heck don't they all come in the same color?

    2. That's a fair amount of cash money sittin' there in one photo.

    3. The 'holy trinity' in the Nikon world consists of very heavy, very expensive, very capable zoom lenses (70-200, 24-70, 12-24, all 2.8). This is good - it saves me from ordering in four Olympus primes today. :biggrin:

    4. Quintessential Quartet is perfect.

    Jim
     
  3. kwalsh

    kwalsh Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    827
    Mar 3, 2012
    Baltimore, MD
    I guess I can forgive the 25/1.4 as it is from a different manufacturer. The funny thing is the 45 is even a slightly different silver from the 12 and the 75 which are a bit more golden in tone. I guess I stopped worrying about color awhile ago. When I was buying Panasonic bodies I always just bought what was cheapest and available, so I ended up with a blue G1 and a gold GH2. I do have a black OM-D, but that was only because it became available first. Still, how hard is it to just make lenses in black?

    Oh goodness yes. That is actually one of the things I like about m43, they didn't not fall into the "small=cheap" trap and have made some very nice lenses. One could argue about whether they are overpriced or a bargain, but all I really care about is they have made some excellent lenses.

    m43 is so far lacking a zoom "holy trinity". The 7-14 is probably the only one that qualifies. The 14-45 is amazing for what it is, but I not sure it would live up to the name (not too mention it isn't expensive enough :smile:) . On the longer end there just isn't anything worthy of the title.

    Thanks!
     
  4. ShrubMonkey

    ShrubMonkey Mu-43 Regular

    58
    Apr 6, 2012
    Nice selection, i have the 25 and 45. Interesting you say the 75mm outclasses the others, it looks a fantastic lens, just not a focal length I use. I'm waiting for that Oly 60mm macro next.

    I love primes but went for the 7-14 over the 12
     
  5. arad85

    arad85 Mu-43 Veteran

    477
    Aug 16, 2012
    Do you not consider the Panny 12-35 any good? It is, after all, a 24-70 equivalent....
     
  6. kwalsh

    kwalsh Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    827
    Mar 3, 2012
    Baltimore, MD
    I haven't tried that one yet, but I think your are right that is probably the most likely contender. I hope the 35-100 ends up being a good one as well. Still, everything past 100 is a bit of a compromise, although both the 100-300 and 75-300 sound like decent if not spectacular lenses.

    But yes, maybe the 7-14, 12-35, 35-100 will be a zoom trinity. Or perhaps Olympus will eventually do a m43 SHG zoom.

    Ken
     
  7. arad85

    arad85 Mu-43 Veteran

    477
    Aug 16, 2012
    I'm certainly hoping so (my 7-14 and 12-35 are in a DHL facility in the UK...).
     
  8. ShrubMonkey

    ShrubMonkey Mu-43 Regular

    58
    Apr 6, 2012
    Very nice Andy, 7-14 is a cracking lens, love to hear your thoughts on the 12-35 too
     
  9. jloden

    jloden Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 15, 2012
    Hunterdon County, NJ
    Jay
    I would say when the 35-100 is finally released, we'll have the trinity of zoom lenses for m4/3 with the 7-14, 12-35, and 35-100 lenses. The 7-14 and 12-35 are exceptional lenses (you'd expect them to be, for the price premium) so assuming the 35-100 continues the trend it should complete the set nicely :thumbup:
     
  10. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    The M. Zuiko 75mm has some good weight to it (in terms of other MFT lenses) :smile:
     
  11. dornblaser

    dornblaser Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 13, 2012
    Chicago-area
    David Dornblaser
    My prime quartet for travel/urban is going to be:

    O12
    new O17 or O25
    O45
    Small Zoom 14-42 or 12-50 (waiting for the 12-60).

    I still haven't gotten my head around the FL of the O75.

    For nature, hiking, wildlife, etc., I use zooms primarily.
     
  12. Mijo

    Mijo Mu-43 Veteran

    220
    Jan 23, 2012
    San Francisco, CA
    my current travel quartet is mainly the 8, 12, PL25 and the PL 45. When called for I'll sub either the 12-50 (for adverse conditions) or the 100-300 (for more reach), for the PL 45.
     
  13. danska

    danska Mu-43 Top Veteran

    945
    May 21, 2012
    Portland, OR
    Joe
    I like the name!

    Mine would be: 7-14, 12-35, PL25, Oly 45. I'd like the replace the 45 with the 75, but the release of the 60mm macro changed my outlook on that.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.