Question on AF performance with E-M1 MFT Lens vs 4/3 lens with adapter?

Discussion in 'Olympus Cameras' started by LoneRider, Mar 8, 2014.

  1. LoneRider

    LoneRider Mu-43 Veteran

    250
    Feb 25, 2014
    Marysville, WA.
    Wayne
    So I am looking at the options for a 300mm zoom and have a question.

    Any considerable AF or IQ performance gain to go with the MFT 75-300mm lens compared to the older 4/3 70-300mm lens and the converter?

    The older lens is a little faster and it looks like the adapter and older lens can be had for about $100 less than the new lens.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. mattia

    mattia Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 3, 2012
    The Netherlands
    The native will be much smaller and have much better AF performance. I had the Panasonic 100-300, now have the 43 50-200 SWD, which is an excellent lens, and the AF is decent in good light, and acceptable in dim light. Adding the 1.4 teleconverter decreases AF performance slightly. The 100-300 was half the size and weight (and a much slower lens optically, but really quite good optically - not in the same quality range overall though) and has much better AF performance in all lighting conditions. Add the fact the 43 75-300 isn't exactly known for its stellar image quality, and it's a no contest situation. The 50-200 is a different story due to optical quality combined with faster aperture.

    Short version: get the native micro four thirds lens.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    Dara
    The newer lens is both faster to focus and sharper. Even on the E-M1, native CDAF performance is a notch faster than PDAF performance, and it's a lot less finicky about contrast and lower light. The half stop speed disadvantage at the long end isn't as big as it might be, since the 70-300 isn't all that sharp wide open. You also save half a pound in weight with the 75-300. The one thing the 70-300 does do that the 75-300 can't is focus quite close - it'll give you 1:2 magnification which can be handy for long macro shots (vs. ~1:5).
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Clint

    Clint Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Apr 22, 2013
    San Diego area, CA
    Clint
    I sold my 4/3 75-300 - go with the newer one. A viable option is a used 4/3 55-200 with adapter - but I'm not selling mine!
     
  5. OzRay

    OzRay Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 29, 2010
    South Gippsland, Australia
    Ray, not Oz
    The only m4/3 lenses I have are the 17mm f2.8 and the 14-42mm kit; however, I have a full compliment of top pro lenses, as well as the 18-180mm 4/3 lens. The focus performance with the 4/3 lenses on the E-M1 is as fast as with my previous E-5. The m4/3 lenses are in no way faster. Also, my gut feeling is that the E-M1 focusses faster in low light with the 4/3 lenses than did the E-5. I would have no hesitation in recommending 4/3 lenses with the E-M1.
     
  6. LoneRider

    LoneRider Mu-43 Veteran

    250
    Feb 25, 2014
    Marysville, WA.
    Wayne
    So, $256 for a Zuiko 70-300mm and the MMF2 adapter is going to be very comparable and possibly equal in performance (IQ and AF wise) to the $550 M.Zuiko 75-300mm on an M1?
     
  7. mattia

    mattia Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 3, 2012
    The Netherlands
    No. The native will be faster.
     
  8. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    Dara
    I don't agree on the IQ. The 70-300 isn't especially sharp at f/5.6. The 75-300 is maximally sharp wide open. You can find it for under $400 secondhand or refurbished.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.