Providing supporting information

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I notice in a lot of post where photos are attached, that often there is no information regarding what camera, lens and other accessories (if appropriate) and techniques were used to get the photo. Personally, I'm always interested in how a photo was taken, especially if it's very good, as that informs me of potential new and innovative techniques, capability of cameras and lenses etc and adds to my knowledge base. It's a habit that I try to maintain whenever I post a photo, but refrain from asking each time I see a photo with no information, for if it's not part of the photo, then it's likely to get lost. What are other people's thoughts? Should we encourage posting how the shots were taken when photos are posted?
 

biomed

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,669
Location
Seattle area
Real Name
Mike
I will try to remember to note what camera/lens was used whenever I post another photo. It is easy most of the time with digital cameras with the EXIF data. I do have a few images taken with adapted lenses that I did not record which lens was used.

Mike
 

barry13

Mu-43.com Editor
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
9,140
Location
Southern California
Real Name
Barry
I notice a lot of the images posted here have no EXIF data (I have a browser plugin to show EXIF); maybe those are mostly linked to Flickr, Picasa, etc.

But yes, I would like to see more info posted.

Barry
 

gprana

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Feb 3, 2014
Messages
63
It's a habit that I try to maintain whenever I post a photo, but refrain from asking each time I see a photo with no information, for if it's not part of the photo, then it's likely to get lost. What are other people's thoughts? Should we encourage posting how the shots were taken when photos are posted?
IMHO you should just ask :smile: The person uploading the photo might simply feel that it's unnecessary to include such information in the post. Even if some details are really not recorded, the photographer might still remember something about location, approximate time, and some of the settings / accessories (e.g. filter) used.
 

Petrochemist

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,190
Location
N Essex, UK
Real Name
Mike
Saving for web in Photoshop strips the EXIF, and I sure there are other packages that do the same.
There's a good chance the poster doesn't realize the EXIF is missing.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
IMHO you should just ask :smile: The person uploading the photo might simply feel that it's unnecessary to include such information in the post. Even if some details are really not recorded, the photographer might still remember something about location, approximate time, and some of the settings / accessories (e.g. filter) used.
The problem is, I would be asking very frequently, that's why I'm asking it here, so as to cover as much ground as possible in one hit. By giving some information, even as little as camera/lens combination would help people better appreciate what certain gear can achieve. If a photograph is memorable enough to post on the forum, I suspect that the shooting parameters etc should be reasonably easy to remember. I certainly try to remember/document what I've shot, for if something is very successful, I would like to be able to repeat it in the future.

But I'm not trying to enforce anything, just suggesting that a lot of people would find it interesting and informative. If you're not interested in providing additional information, that's a personal choice.
 

jyc860923

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
3,079
Location
Shenyang, China
Real Name
贾一川
Someone mentioned this a year or two ago, which is a nice idea. and I love to see the info too, I just often forgot to include them, will try to do so. Thanks Ray.
 

Matero

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
528
Location
Finland
Saving for web in Photoshop strips the EXIF, and I sure there are other packages that do the same.
There's a good chance the poster doesn't realize the EXIF is missing.
This is why I recently started to use belt and suspender, so to say. I use Better Rename -application in MacOSX to rename files and include EXIF data to filename itself. Reduce risk to accidentally loose valuable info of the EXIF data.
 

BAXTING

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
805
Location
Los Angeles SFV, CA
Real Name
Bradley
I dont always include my exif data, but I recently have made an effort to do so. I think it is a great idea for us to share not only our images but our technique as well. Seems like most of us just got used to sharing images. I will definitely make an effort to share exif data when sharing images if appropriate. Thanks for bringing this up OzRay.
 

Lodos

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
58
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Ray, this is a great idea,

as a newbie, for countless times I have wondered about the lens and other settings in pictures posted in this group or flickr. Especially in manual glass, focal length, lens and aperture info usually not recorded in exif file either.. (I wish there was a way to manually enter it in the camera). In my pentax K-x when I was entering lens focal length for IBIS (as done in olympus) it was recording in lens focal length in the exif mm section.. I wish my pm2 could do the same..

anyway, thanks for bringing this up, I hope with your encouragement, it will be more practiced..
 

fortwodriver

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
993
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Real Name
Frank
Is there not a way to read that information into the forum automagically? I've seen forums where photos posted automatically appended a 5 or so line description from any available EXIF info stored in the jpeg.

There's also a plug-in out there for some browsers, when you hover over an image on a webpage, it will pop-up the exif info - but I haven't seen that one in ages - it was for Firefox.
 

jamesgehrt

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
165
Location
Easthampton, Massachusetts
Real Name
James Gehrt
I have been pulling my images from my flickr stream. When I click on the image I go to download / view all sizes, I copy the url. After posting that, I just copy the basic EXIF info from the flickr layout and paste it under the photo url in the reply box. It is very quick and convenient. I too enjoy seeing the information.
 

barry13

Mu-43.com Editor
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
9,140
Location
Southern California
Real Name
Barry

karma

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
79
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Peter
As a novice photographer, I would love to see more info posted with photos. It really helps me learn what lenses/bodies are capable of doing.
 

JudyM

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
1,363
Location
Westminster, MD
I like the idea. Learning from others is the reason I joined this forum in the first place. At a minimum, the camera / lens combination used could be provided with very little effort. This topic came up a year or two ago, and some argued that they shouldn't have to add that information, because it's in the EXIF if someone wants it. That's not really the point. The point is to learn and help others learn. As someone just mentioned, adapted lenses don't appear in EXIF info. When I'm in the market for a new lens, being able to see what a lens can do and how it renders is very important to me. I realize it would take more effort to include details about a technique used, extra equipment or special processing, but I think it would interest many. I do regularly include camera / lens info, but I'll try to be better about including any other details that I think might be helpful.
 

dhazeghi

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
4,365
Location
San Jose, CA
Real Name
Dara
It's a habit that I try to maintain whenever I post a photo, but refrain from asking each time I see a photo with no information, for if it's not part of the photo, then it's likely to get lost. What are other people's thoughts? Should we encourage posting how the shots were taken when photos are posted?
I think it's very useful in cases where you're troubleshooting, or trying to demonstrate a particular technique. But for many (most?) of the images that get posted, is that data really all that illuminating? For your typical landscape or portrait at web resolution, the only shooting parameter that makes a visible impact is the focal length and maybe the aperture, and even there, there's not that much variety.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I think it's very useful in cases where you're troubleshooting, or trying to demonstrate a particular technique. But for many (most?) of the images that get posted, is that data really all that illuminating? For your typical landscape or portrait at web resolution, the only shooting parameter that makes a visible impact is the focal length and maybe the aperture, and even there, there's not that much variety.
I think the main additions would camera, lens and focal length if using a zoom. That gives people an idea of what they can expect from a particular camera/lens combination. Additional information can be handy such as whether the unit was hand held or on a tripod/monopod and if any other accessory was used. I don't really see a need for shutter speed, ISO, aperture etc, unless it's germane to what you're demonstrating. For example, when I posted an image taken with the 90-250mm indoors and hand held, the information was relevant to the photo.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom