portraits

caimi

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
1,093
Location
middle US
Real Name
Caimi caimiphotography.com
canvas10.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


canvas7.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


canvas4.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


canvas5.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


canvas6.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


canvas2.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


canvas3.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


canvas1.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


PanGH3, Oly EM5, Oly EPL5, Pan G5
 

kevinparis

Cantankerous Scotsman
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
3,912
Location
Gent, Belgium
somebody obviously got some new PP software for christmas :)

often less is more..... as soon as you are looking at the effect and not the picture you have gone too far!!!

just my thoughts

K
 

caimi

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
1,093
Location
middle US
Real Name
Caimi caimiphotography.com
New use of existing software. But thanks for your thoughts, Kevin. Look again. The effect is the image. Just my thoughts.
 

RevBob

Super Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
4,680
Location
NorthWestern PA
Real Name
Bob
My first reaction was to agree with Kevin, but on further reflection and a second, third and fourth look I like them as they are. The different textures highlight the subjects in very interesting ways. Cool. :2thumbs:
 

Crdome

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
6,927
Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Real Name
Michael
Caimi -I must think about these for a while. Unfortunately I'm approaching this style from a decades old, deeply ingrained biases against anything Giclée.

Image 5 is a knockout!

-Chrome
 

caimi

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
1,093
Location
middle US
Real Name
Caimi caimiphotography.com
Chrome,

If by "giclee" you mean tacky, I take that as a compliment. I have achieved my goal. The idea is to get the viewer to see a picture of an individual, not an individual. Whether an animal or a human is depicted, it is still a two dimensional object you're looking at, not a person. In fact the inclusion of animal portraits is intended to further this idea along as well. The deliberate use of heavy handed (and possibly tacky) post processing software gets the viewer to consider what he is looking at rather than accept someone else's pre-ordained notion of what the image should be or what he should be seeing. As I said, the effect is the image. Kevin, above said, "Often less is more." I say, "Most often, less is just less."
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom