Pentax Q-S1... DOA?

Evan614

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
116
Location
BuckeyeState
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-q-s1/pentax-q-s1A.HTM

Seems Pentax came out with a new mirrorless camera with a 1/1.7 chip. Would of nice to have seen this 4 years ago.
Call me pessimistic but it seems more like DOA (Dead On Arrival) camera.
what exact niche does it serve? It about the same size as my PM2 and my PM2 does almost everything the S1 does. S1 has HDR and my PM2 doesn't

Only plus I see is: knobs to play with.

Would you buy this? If so.. for what reason? what purpose does it serve?.... that your other camera(s) don't meet.
 

wjiang

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
7,257
Location
Christchurch, New Zealand
Comparing m4/3 to Q is like comparing 35mm to m4/3. Blunty (on YouTube) loves Pentax Q because the high quality lenses are tiny and you still get full manual controls. An E-PM/GM is only a tad bigger, but way fewer physical controls, and the lenses on the whole are bigger. Also C-mount lenses start to get interesting as you don't get the vignetting problem. But yes, a very niche market that the Q serves.
 

LeeOsenton

Mu-43 Button Clicker
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
329
Location
Hayes, Virginia, U.S.A.
Real Name
Lee Osenton
I used to have a Q but moved back to m43 for IQ. I now use an E-PM2 and love it, but the Q is very hard to leave behind. It has a unique character that seems to change how you shoot. It made me less technical in taking photos. Almost like perfection mattered less than capturing the feel. I think you have to be in the Q world to understand. It isn't smaller by enough to matter, it isn't better, and it isn't faster. It has a difficult to quantify quality. I only recommend them to hobbyists that understand the limits.
 

John M Flores

Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
2,972
Location
NJ
I used to have a Q but moved back to m43 for IQ. I now use an E-PM2 and love it, but the Q is very hard to leave behind. It has a unique character that seems to change how you shoot. It made me less technical in taking photos. Almost like perfection mattered less than capturing the feel. I think you have to be in the Q world to understand. It isn't smaller by enough to matter, it isn't better, and it isn't faster. It has a difficult to quantify quality. I only recommend them to hobbyists that understand the limits.
Exactly. The Q is the only small camera that I know that behaves like a mini DSLR, not like a computer with a lens. The controls and menus are very similar to my other Pentax gear, and thanks to the built-in intervalometer, shake reduction, and wide lenses, it's been my rigged motorcycle shooter for several years now.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
On the Million Dollar Highway with a Victory Cory Ness Cross Country Tour by john m flores, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Riding in Acadia National Park, Schoodic Peninsula, ME by john m flores, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Exploring the Northeast Kingdom #NEK VT by john m flores, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Apex Hunting by john m flores, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Ontario_RoadRUNNER_Jun14.pdf by john m flores, on Flickr


In good light it produces images that are magazine worthy, and in low light I've got other cameras.

Plus, I've heard that it's been a hit in Japan, so there's that.

So don't be a pessimist. It's got unique features, and IQ isn't the be-all, end-all.
 

darosk

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
706
Location
Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
Real Name
Daros
I've always adored the concept of the Pentax Q's. One of these days I will have to suck it up and finally get one.
 

fortwodriver

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
993
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Real Name
Frank
I know exactly 5 people who don't know each other, but own Pentax Q cameras. They all LOVE them. They like the high contrast, little bit of grit the images contain and the size. The way some people talk about those cameras, you'd think it was the second coming of the Kodak Disc camera or something equally wretched.
 

LeeOsenton

Mu-43 Button Clicker
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
329
Location
Hayes, Virginia, U.S.A.
Real Name
Lee Osenton
The coolest pentax hat-trick is taking a photo in jpg mode and then changing your mind and saving the raw (only the last picture can be recovered in raw). Does any other brand do this?
 

drd1135

Zen Snapshooter
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
6,100
Location
Southwest Virginia
Real Name
Steve
The trick with the Q is that it's a really nice camera to use. The controls, the menus, etc. make it a really fun camera to use, especially for something so small. Look at the complaints about the controls on the GM1. The GM1 and the Q have similar size. I'd love to have a GM1 with the Q control layout.
 

phigmov

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
4,436
I'd love a 'Q' - always keeping an eye out for the clearance prices with the little prime. It just looks like a fun shooter. Hopefully the Q7 price will drop through the floor now :)
 

RichardB

Snapshooter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
495
Location
Maryland, US
Real Name
Richard
I had a Q with the standard prime and it took very nice photos. The sensor was small but it punched above its weight. I have seen amazing astrophotography done with the Q, thanks to its fast sensor and high crop factor.

I decided to stick with one system, MFT, so I sold my Q, but I respect anyone who chooses the Q system.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom