I am still dreaming about my future :43: setup, which will be some time off yet... but I doubt I can afford both the Panasonic 14mm and 20/1.7, at least initially. What would you choose if you could only have one? Would your answer change if you were in my position of also having an OM Zuiko 28/3.5 (plus various longer OMZs) and most likely the oly 14-42 kit zoom? I'm curious to know your thoughts. I'm thinking, if the 28/3.5 turned out to give good IQ and be easy to use, then maybe I'd get the 14... otherwise I guess I'd get the 20 and try to get over its FOV limitations with stitching (or using the kit zoom... but I prefer primes). Ideally I reckon I'd rather a 25 to complement the 14, but maybe I'm just hanging on to what I got used to with film (28 then 50).