edited 11/24 to remove any controversy. My aim is to effect an improvement in Panasonic repair process, not to create controversies. I'd like to propose Amin start an online petition to ask Panasonic to create a business class support that is responsive to an SLA (service level agreement) to ensure predictable repair. Sony recognizes this distinction between consumers and working professionals. If Panasonic wants to succeed in the segment their GH-Class is targeted at, they should follow suit. I will cross-post on DVinfo.net and mu-32.com, so please sign only one petition. To those unfamiliar, an SLA in this context is an pre-negotiated time to repair. An SLA can include penalties and/or pre-determined remedies if the time-to-repair agreement is not met. For example, if your GH1 is not repairable and it's so old a replacement cannot be obtained, options may include partial or total refund of any service fee, or discount toward another model of camera. All this must be done withing a given time frame by Panasonic. Advantages: It provides the customer a predictable time frame for repair so they won't lose business because the camera is in the shop for months at a time. (My GH1 spent four months in repair before declared unfixable.) For Panasonic, it could be an extra profit center if offered as an add-on to normal warranty. Sony has a slightly different approach, they use consumer and commercial class of equipment. The former has no SLA, the latter, I've seen repair completed in as little as 10 days, in some cases, inexpensive rental of loaner camera is one of the options available.