Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 Now Available for Pre-Order

speedandstyle

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
2,477
Location
Roswell NM yes that Roswell!
The MTF chart for the Summilux 15 looks pretty good/similar against the MTF chart for the Nocticron.
The Nocticron has a nearly perfect chart! But yes the 15mm is very good. Of coarse the chart cannot give the whole picture. Waiting to see some more and better samples from the 15mm but I am very impressed so far.

Several people have said they have little or no clue to reading an MTF chart. Rather than me try and explain I have given two excellent links to help you understand them.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/understanding-mtf.shtml

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/lens-quality-mtf-resolution.htm

MTFs represent the full image circle but the sensor size is always smaller. In the 15mm MTF the image size is 22mm in diameter{the chart shows half from center to the edge}. A m4/3 sensor is 17.3mm by 13mm, using the larger dimension of 17.3mm and splitting it in half we get 8.65mm. If you look at the MTF at that point there is just a tiny bit of a downward curve and the sagital and meridonial lines for each line per inch size are super close to each other. This lens should be very sharp with good bokeh.
 

Microman

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
36
Hm, I just purchased a used 12mm f/2 (for about half the retail price) and just now I read about the Panasonic 15mm. There's big difference between the field of view of a 24mm and a 30mm equivalent of course. You can't really compare them. I might give the Panasonic 15mm a try though.
 

taz98spin

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2011
Messages
843
Location
NYC
Amazon has their link up too!

Just pre-ordered the black one! :smile:
 

BobbyTan

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
606
Location
Long Beach, CA
Hm, I just purchased a used 12mm f/2 (for about half the retail price) and just now I read about the Panasonic 15mm. There's big difference between the field of view of a 24mm and a 30mm equivalent of course. You can't really compare them. I might give the Panasonic 15mm a try though.
True. The 24mm is great as a w/a lens but the 35mm FL is slightly better as a general/walkaround lens and if you don't own a standard lens. For the longest time I could not decide between the Canon 24/1.4 and 35/1.4 as they are both excellent lenses for environmental portraits. I ended up not buying either one of them and just stuck to my w/a zoom instead. I was faced with the same dilemma with the 12/2 vs 17/1.8 … but it was easier making a decision here - I got the 17/1.8 as it was significantly less expensive especially when they ran the rebate program.

But as good as the 17/1.8 and 12/2 lenses are, I believe the Summilux 15 is a better lens … and also cheaper than the 12/2, so I pre-ordered it!

The nice thing about a fast prime (compared to the 12-40/2.8) is its ability to isolate the background when used for environmental portraits. I am already considering selling my 12-40 and PL 25/1.4 as I think the Summilux and Nocticron can do a better job overall. I will definitely get the 7-14/2.8 to replace my Lumix 7-14/4 when it comes out next year.
 

Smashatom

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Messages
123
Location
Stratford-Upon-Avon, UK
Real Name
Sam
Does anyone with a 20mm think this could fit into their kit?

I love my 20mm, but would really like to replace my 14mm, I just don't know if 30mm and 40mm are too close....? I could consider swapping the 20mm for a 25mm but I don't think I could part with it!

Anyone in the same boat?
 

sebs_color

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
191
Location
Virginia Beach, Virginia
Real Name
Sebastian
I hate to complain about the price of this lens, because they are relatively inexpensive compared to DSLRs, but why must it be 600! I know why, it's awesome.
 

tomO2013

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
864
I hate to complain about the price of this lens, because they are relatively inexpensive compared to DSLRs, but why must it be 600! I know why, it's awesome.
For the same reason that there are differently priced lenses on other systems - you are paying for higher quality optics. :)
If it is built well, has great optics, focuses fast, then it will justify it's price. But let's wait and see.

This is a personal opinion and not targetted at you specifically. I'm saying this in the general sense. But...
I look at the m43 system today as being mature enough to stand on it's own toe to toe against any other format as a valid real world option for the majority of photography work and majority of print sizes people undertake.

A mature system should have a range of lenses in different overlapping focal lengths with different optical qualities and different price brackets, from mainstream to niche.
I've no problem with higher priced lenses within the m43 ecosystem that justify themselves both in terms of optics and build. Of course I want to have my cake and eat it too, but that is where the Oly45 and Oly25 fit in ;) But if I want that extra special rendering lens like the Nocticron, Oly 75, PL25, then I am happy to pay for them. I'm aware that money does not grow on trees but these are bargains given what they can achieve in terms of optics and build.

It may simply be a mental barrier , or even possibly underdog syndrome, but many people complain when a m43 lens is priced above 500 dollars. We need to stop looking at the system as a whole as being a 'cheaper alternative' to the 35mm small, 120mm medium and APS-C formats etc... and just look at it as a system unto it's own that has it's own look and feel and with good lenses and bad lenses.
The PL15mm is actually good for the system as a whole if it justifies it's costs.

Just my 0.02

Tom.
 

napilopez

Contributing Editor
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
826
Location
NYC Area
Real Name
Napier Lopez
For the same reason that there are differently priced lenses on other systems - you are paying for higher quality optics. :)
If it is built well, has great optics, focuses fast, then it will justify it's price. But let's wait and see.

This is a personal opinion and not targetted at you specifically. I'm saying this in the general sense. But...
I look at the m43 system today as being mature enough to stand on it's own toe to toe against any other format as a valid real world option for the majority of photography work and majority of print sizes people undertake.

A mature system should have a range of lenses in different overlapping focal lengths with different optical qualities and different price brackets, from mainstream to niche.
I've no problem with higher priced lenses within the m43 ecosystem that justify themselves both in terms of optics and build. Of course I want to have my cake and eat it too, but that is where the Oly45 and Oly25 fit in ;) But if I want that extra special rendering lens like the Nocticron, Oly 75, PL25, then I am happy to pay for them. I'm aware that money does not grow on trees but these are bargains given what they can achieve in terms of optics and build.

It may simply be a mental barrier , or even possibly underdog syndrome, but many people complain when a m43 lens is priced above 500 dollars. We need to stop looking at the system as a whole as being a 'cheaper alternative' to the 35mm small, 120mm medium and APS-C formats etc... and just look at it as a system unto it's own that has it's own look and feel and with good lenses and bad lenses.
The PL15mm is actually good for the system as a whole if it justifies it's costs.

Just my 0.02

Tom.
Exactly! This is the point I've continually said about M4/3, that its advantage lies primarily in its versatility. It's crazy to think I can shoot with my E-M5 and the Nocticron as a "large" setup or use my girlfriend's E-PM2 + 45mm f1.8 If I want to travel light, all within the same system.

The difference between M4/3 and other systems though is that despite the fact that the former setup costs about 3 times as much as the cheaper option, the latter one will give you very similar image quality in many scenarios.

M4/3 has very few "bad" lenses. The only system that can match it in availability of quality options is Fuji, but then they don't have the diversity in size and price that M4/3 has.
 

orfeo

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
673
Location
FR
Price in Japan is 54400 yen that roughly 390euros. Its release date seems to be 15 may 2014...
 

MCMLXXIII AD

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
50
Location
London
Real Name
Mahesh
Or this plus the 45mm f1.8would make for a great tiny two-lens kit, I think.
How much would you think in the real world use, i.e. family portraits, walkaround, etc. 42.5 make difference than 45/1.8? I am debating with myself which one to keep.
One is obviously the best and the other much better in compactness while still holding its own.
 

leftnose

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
46
Does anyone with a 20mm think this could fit into their kit?

I love my 20mm, but would really like to replace my 14mm, I just don't know if 30mm and 40mm are too close....? I could consider swapping the 20mm for a 25mm but I don't think I could part with it!

Anyone in the same boat?
My current native MFT setup is a 20 and 45. I've pre-ordered the 15. I'm not currently planning on selling the 20mm but I do see it being displaced in the duo for "serious" photography. The 20 has always been ever so slightly too long for my preferences as a primary lens but its size is a huge plus. I see using the 15/45 when going out to shoot. I see using just the 20 when going out to dinner. Just slot the great 20 into a slightly different roll because of its size.
 

Fmrvette

This Space For Rent
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,216
Location
Detroit, Michigan
Real Name
Jim
Does anyone with a 20mm think this could fit into their kit?

I love my 20mm, but would really like to replace my 14mm, I just don't know if 30mm and 40mm are too close....? I could consider swapping the 20mm for a 25mm but I don't think I could part with it!

Anyone in the same boat?
Hi Sam!

Yeah, I have a seat in the boat.

The size/weight of the 14/20/45 prime combination I have right now is just about perfect for me and I'm reluctant to mess with something that works.

Moving to a 15/25/45 setup would add cost and mass...and I really like the two Panasonic pancakes.

It's always tempting to try to up the image quality - but I've chased that elusive butterfly before :biggrin:. I'll be looking forward to photos taken with the new lens by photographers who have deeper pockets, longer arms, and more talent than I - but for now my personal "holy trinity" will remain the 14/20/45.

(What I need is a native M4/3 200mm f/4.0 or f/2.8 prime lens - and what the manufacturers keep releasing is on the wide/normal/short telephoto lens. It would maybe kill them to give up a reasonably priced longer telephoto???)

Size comparison with 14mm and 15mm lenses mounted on an E-M5:

http://j.mp/1l7lHbb

Regards,

Jim
 

Smashatom

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Messages
123
Location
Stratford-Upon-Avon, UK
Real Name
Sam
Hi Sam!

Yeah, I have a seat in the boat.

The size/weight of the 14/20/45 prime combination I have right now is just about perfect for me and I'm reluctant to mess with something that works.

Moving to a 15/25/45 setup would add cost and mass...and I really like the two Panasonic pancakes.

It's always tempting to try to up the image quality - but I've chased that elusive butterfly before :biggrin:. I'll be looking forward to photos taken with the new lens by photographers who have deeper pockets, longer arms, and more talent than I - but for now my personal "holy trinity" will remain the 14/20/45.

(What I need is a native M4/3 200mm f/4.0 or f/2.8 prime lens - and what the manufacturers keep releasing is on the wide/normal/short telephoto lens. It would maybe kill them to give up a reasonably priced longer telephoto???)

Size comparison with 14mm and 15mm lenses mounted on an E-M5:

http://j.mp/1l7lHbb

Regards,

Jim
See I don't really mind mass, I have a big rucksack. Cost, is an issue but I guess if I plan now I can save for it quite easily.

The 14 is the only lens in my kit that i'm not 100% happy with, I do love the angle of view and it is amazing for the cost but it's the only lens I own where I notice significant flaw.

I'm basically trying to convince myself I need it!

Your post seems to have changed me from maybe wanting it, to really wanting it! I think it was the size comparison, It looks so good on the EM5!

I'm looking forward to reviews and some sample images. Anyone know a UK release date?
 

Fmrvette

This Space For Rent
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,216
Location
Detroit, Michigan
Real Name
Jim
I'm basically trying to convince myself I need it!
I see a financial expenditure in your near future followed by hours of Photographic Bliss..:biggrin:

See I don't really mind mass,..
That factor is keeping me out of a lot of trouble these days. When I looked at the reviews on the 12mm (to replace the pancake 14) I decided I'd rather "have it's room than it's company" :biggrin:.

Maybe it's just a phase I'm going through but every time I look at something bigger than what I already have I hesitate. Monday my 9mm body cap lens arrived and I'm really going to try to eliminate the need for the Rokinon 7.5. I find the Rokinon to be cumbersome given the few times I use it, while the 9mm BCL adds nearly nothing in the way of mass to the kit.

But I will look forward to seeing the pics from your new 15mm!!!

Regards,

Jim
 

Slim

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 7, 2013
Messages
298
I wonder how it will look on the gx 1.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Zee

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
577
Location
Surry Hills, Aus/ Baguio & Manila, Philippines
...

(What I need is a native M4/3 200mm f/4.0 or f/2.8 prime lens - and what the manufacturers keep releasing is on the wide/normal/short telephoto lens. It would maybe kill them to give up a reasonably priced longer telephoto???)


Regards,

Jim
I'm with you here. Though I want a 300 F2.8, though F4 is ok if they really must go that slow... I know Oly have one coming, but it's a looong way away.

*Le sigh*

Z...
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom