Hello guys -- which of those 2 cameras produce better looking JPEGs - no RAW just SOOC pictures ? Any noticable difference in DR or colors? is it better to buy G9 - despite its over 3 yaers old camera or go with Olympus Mark 3 ? Thanks in advance.
Thank you for asking. Ive been using GH4 for 2 years and now G9 for 3. Overall , im happy with picture and video quality but there is other factor. Ive spotted many dust specks in 12-35 2.8 lens,a year later same happened to 35-100.Do you have any previous experience with either Panasonic or Olympus? Is there a reason for only those two cameras as your options? If you give us some more information for what you're looking for then the collective wisdom could probably come up with a better recommendation.
My first Olympus had a crack in the bezel around the screen. Same as Alex above.Thank you for asking. Ive been using GH4 for 2 years and now G9 for 3. Overall , im happy with picture and video quality but there is other factor. Ive spotted many dust specks in 12-35 2.8 lens,a year later same happened to 35-100.
Now with the G9 - which looks like brand new camera Ive noticed hairline crack right by rear screen hinge - camera was never dropped nor handled unproperly. Honestly, those issues getting on my nerves. Im thinking about Olympus now, especially still have Panleica 42.5, 8-18 and Olympus 12-100 . Thinking about Fuji and Sony FF as well but really love those above mentioned lenses and im getting tired of system changes over last decade. Basically - im asking if picture quality will be on pair on those cameras and CC better with Olympus?