Panasonic 25mm/1.4 or Panasonic 35-100 for trip?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by pix530, Jan 8, 2014.

  1. pix530

    pix530 Mu-43 Regular

    72
    Oct 2, 2013
    BC/WA
    Not sure if my 35-100 will work fine on wide side close to 25mm in terms of IQ?
    Any ideas, esp from owners of both lenses much appreciated.

    Have to think fast, go to 2 weeks trip to Miami and shoot stated portrait only.

    PS: Will take my 75mm with me for sure, I LOVE it )
     
  2. Is this for work? Why not take both?
     
  3. pix530

    pix530 Mu-43 Regular

    72
    Oct 2, 2013
    BC/WA
    I dont have 25mm so need to buy one. In this case I'll have wide angle (for portrait). But I travel and already have some gear to carry including 75mm, 35-100, tripod and second camera. So 25mm is an expense for me if I decide to buy it now again. Plus its additional weight and I am not huge fan of changing lenses.
    I love 75 and would take everything with it, but inside and for some shootings its just tooo long. Thats why I take 35-100.

    I thought I can leave 35-100 at home, but it would be a mistake as mostly conditions will be close to ideal. So zoom should work fine too. Relatively fine )
     
  4. I'm guessing your gear list is no longer accurate, given that it still lists a PL25. If you still have the Fuji though, why not just use the 35mm f/1.4 with it? That has about the same FoV and aperture as the PL25 anyway.
     
  5. val

    val Mu-43 Top Veteran

    548
    Dec 19, 2013
    Australia
    William
    I'd go for the 35-100mm unless your shooting style would use the 25mm a lot.
     
  6. uci2ci

    uci2ci Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 22, 2012
    Los Angeles, CA
    Sam
    If you're going to buy a lens for portraits, why not the 45 f1.8?...just saying

    I have the 25 1.4, While I use it for portraits, I don't think its the best lens for it. Your 35-100 and 75 are better for portraits IMO...the 45 hits the middle sweet spot.
     
  7. Lindsay D

    Lindsay D Mu-43 Veteran

    352
    Jan 2, 2013
    West Sussex, England
    Lindsay
    The 25 is lovely for full length, group, and wider environmental portraits. But for anything tighter than that the 35-100 f2.8 is ideal. However the 45 f1.8 is super versatile and would be my first choice, given how affordable it is.
     
  8. pix530

    pix530 Mu-43 Regular

    72
    Oct 2, 2013
    BC/WA
    wjiang, its my fault as I never updated gear list. I don't have 25mm anymore. Sold it and it was my biggest dilemma btw. I had it and I like it.

    I do not need 45mm, I had it too and this is not a question for me, as I prefer 75mm in all aspects.

    My question now is if I should buy 25mm (again) and use it more than 35 on wide end. Its not about mm, its all about IQ and ...versatility.
    I hate a lot to change lenses, so 2 lenses for 1 body is more than enough. Anyway I know that I will use 75mm 80% of time. Also I don't need 100mm for my trip too.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.