1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

PanaLeica 10-25 - $2,500 and released in Q3

Discussion in 'Micro 4/3 News and Rumors' started by ijm5012, Apr 23, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ijm5012

    ijm5012 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Oct 2, 2013
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ian
  2. ijm5012

    ijm5012 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Oct 2, 2013
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ian
    For all the video-minded folks out there, a new EF-m43 Metabones runs $400 and a new Sigma 18-35 runs $800, putting you at 1/2 the cost of the PL lens (and you could spend far less if you buy a used SB and lens, as both are plentiful on the used market). Plus, you'll still have a faster lens in the end, important for keeping the ISO as low as possible, along with maintaining a true mechanical focusing ring (vs. focus-by-wire on the PL).
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. TNcasual

    TNcasual Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Dec 2, 2014
    Knoxville, TN
    That seems like a great price for the fastest ever zoom.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. ijm5012

    ijm5012 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Oct 2, 2013
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ian
    I suppose it all depends on an individual's intended use, and whether $2,500 is a good value or not.
     
  5. nstelemark

    nstelemark Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    May 28, 2013
    Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
    Larry
    This is basically a 14-35/18-35 competitor with a bias to wider.

    This is certainly a niche lens. But if videographers like it will sell. Both the 14-35 and the 18-35 are popular for video.
     
  6. Pluttis

    Pluttis Mu-43 Veteran

    432
    Nov 14, 2016
    Sweden
    Peter
    Expensive yes, but it was expected as we talk about a high end 10-25mm f1.7 zoom.
     
  7. Turbofrog

    Turbofrog Mu-43 Legend

    Mar 21, 2014
    I think $2500 might be a little bit much based on the info given in the post? In constant currency, it is 8/9ths the price of the Panasonic S1, which costs $2500 in most markets (but $2800 in Russia, where the price was listed). So for Americans, that would be just over $2200, not $2500.

    Which honestly is not a crazy price. If this were a high-quality FF constant aperture f3.4 zoom, you would expect it to be priced in between the f/4 options and the f/2.8 options, so that sets the price range at $1800 +/- $200 right there. Now add the fact that this is a wildly useful 20-50mm focal range that has never been made before, that f/1.7 optics are legitimately more complicated than f2.8 optics (equivalent light gathering aside, just engineering here), and then sprinkle on a small dose of Leica tax and it's hard to expect any lens anything like this to be made by an OEM for less than $2200-2500.

    Again, I'm not in the market for this lens, and I'm sure most of the people on this forum aren't, either. But I'm sure as shit not in the market for a $2000 FF body and a $2000 FF lens (that doesn't even exist!) as an alternative, either.
     
  8. ijm5012

    ijm5012 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Oct 2, 2013
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ian
    @Turbofrog@Turbofrog I agree about the usefulness of the zoom range. This is a perfect lens for walking around a European city. But at $2,500, I truly wonder how many people are going to buy one.

    Personally, I would've preferred that they drop the "Leica" name (since it means absolutely nothing, as the lens was more than likely designed by Sigma and manufactured by Panasonic), and make the lens an f/2 instead of f/1.7 (m43 lenses are tack sharp wide open anyways, and f/2 would help make the lens a wee-bit smaller, lighter, and cheaper).

    It's an interesting lens, but at $2,500 it certainly won't be flying off shelves...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Turbofrog

    Turbofrog Mu-43 Legend

    Mar 21, 2014
    Though as a counterpoint, at $2500 it probably won't need to be flying off shelves to be a profitable product.

    Every camera manufacturer is looking through their actuarial tables and trying to figure out that ideal balance between volume and margin. And everyone seems to be coming down on the side of margin, volume be damned.

    (There is an interesting sidebar about the Canon RP as a potential counterpoint to that argument, but I contend that the RP is actually an upsell for buyers would would otherwise get an $800 EOS M5 or M50 kit, rather than those who are looking downmarket from a $2300 EOS R or $3000 5D IV. So in that light, a $1300 RP is actually lower volume, higher margin sale to entice entry level buyers vs. the traditional crop kit).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. tkbslc

    tkbslc Super Moderator

    I've said on every thread for this lens, that we could have used a 10mm f1.7 prime a whole lot more than this behemoth. I already have myriad ways of covering 12-25mm with fast glass, so that part of the zoom range is not worth the weight and price premium.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  11. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    Look at that, a Panasonic lens I might actually buy
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. DanS

    DanS Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 8, 2016
    Central IL
    If you look at the M43 lens catalog, its not surprising. M43 already has a pretty complete catalog, so the only thing left are niche and halo lenses.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  13. ijm5012

    ijm5012 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Oct 2, 2013
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ian
    While I agree with you regarding the general completeness of the m43 lens catalog, I don't really consider a wider than 24mm FoV lens to be "niche". It's a pretty common UWA prime focal length (20-21mm), but for some reason m43 has failed to produce an AF version, despite it being the most mature mirrorless system on the market.

    We have some fantastic UWA zooms, but no UWA primes (that autofocus). However, the Laowa lenses appear to be great for those that are OK with manual focus (7.5mm f/2 and 9mm f/2.8).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Pluttis

    Pluttis Mu-43 Veteran

    432
    Nov 14, 2016
    Sweden
    Peter
    People have bought and buy more expensive lenses for other systems so dont see why people dedicated to m43 would not buy this lens...but sure i doubt it will be a topp seller.

    Look at prices on native lenses for FF, zoom lenses with 2.8 aperture cost over $2000, Canons 28-70 f2.0 is $3000
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Turbofrog

    Turbofrog Mu-43 Legend

    Mar 21, 2014
    It is puzzling that there's no 9mm or 10mm AF prime. Really puzzling.

    But I guess they looked at the numbers and found that people don't really buy those, and would generally prefer a zoom for ultrawide focal lengths?

    I have no idea. All I know is that I would only buy a 10mm/f1.7 if it was around $400-500, and that can't be the price range that Panasonic wants to sell it to me at. I'm just a humble hobbyist.

    But the people shooting commercial video (really the only growing imaging business category) will drop $2500 on a lens like 10-25/f1.7 and pay it off on the first job. Panasonic must know which side its bread is buttered on, surely.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. D7k1

    D7k1 Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Nov 18, 2013
    GH5s and this lens makes a very unique video tool. IMHO for this specific combination it is a a good price when you consider the cost of most "real" video lenses. Not for mere mortals at this time, but I consider it a special tool that has a unique price/value ratio in certain circumstances.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. TNcasual

    TNcasual Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Dec 2, 2014
    Knoxville, TN
    I wonder if it will be parfocal.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. DanS

    DanS Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 8, 2016
    Central IL
    I've always assumed their just isn't enough demand for the manufactures to invest the time and money required to develop them. Not to mention you almost don't need auto focus with UWA lense because the dof is so great.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. tkbslc

    tkbslc Super Moderator

    That's what everyone says, yet I sure have a lot of OOF shots when I operate that way. I find AF to be important with UWA because the details are so small as a portion of the frame that it is hard to tell what is in critical focus without LCD magnification.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  20. ijm5012

    ijm5012 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Oct 2, 2013
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Ian
    I would say that the vast majority of m43 users view the system as more "budget friendly" compared to a FF system. And in general, I would say that pricing and reactions from the user base support that viewpoint:
    • When the E-M1 II launched at $2k, many people were critical of its price point. When the A7 III and Z6 launched at $2k, people applauded them for being affordable (most FF cameras cost significantly more than $2k)
    • An Olympus 45mm f/1.8 and f/1.2 cost $350 and $1200, whereas a Canon 85mm f/1.8 and f/1.2 cost $420 and $2000
    • An Olympus 12-40 f/2.8 costs $1000, whereas a Canon 24-70 f/2.8 costs $1900.
    I would wager a guess that the majority of m43 users got in to the system because of the smaller and cheaper lens and camera bodies. But if prices and sizes continue to approach those of a FF system, why not simply go FF to get the benefits of the larger sensor?

    I understand why Panasonic and Olympus are going up-market as of late. A volume-driven sales strategy simply isn't sustainable given today's market, and thus they need to focus on improving their margins. However, are people really going to be receptive to $3,000 m43 cameras and $2,000 m43 lenses? I know I certainly wouldn't.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.